Just how bad was Haglar robbed if at all against SRL?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TheSouthpaw, Jan 17, 2013.


  1. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    It wasn't a robbery. Just a close fight.
     
  2. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,811
    Aug 26, 2011
    How on God's Green Earth anybody could give the first 6 rounds to SRL is really beyond me. I'm mean seriously beyond me. I'm just glad the people that did aren't judges for professionals fights. Round 2 and 3 can easily be scored for hagler.. Round 5 in a no brainer for me and giving that to Hagler. Somebody please explain how the F you gave that round to Leonard? Anyways, I have scored for hagler and felt he should've won. SRL didn't do enough to convince me he deserved to take the title away from Hagler.
     
  3. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,027
    5,550
    Oct 5, 2009
    Watched most of this fight yesterday after seeing the thread, I think it comes down to what you like

    In most of the early rounds no matter what you lean toward in judging its obvious Leonard should be out front after 6

    Then Hagler begins to get going and from there I think its preference

    I think Hagler is BS'ing us when he said he never felt Ray's punches a few sneaky ones definitely stopped him in his tracks or backed him off

    I also think lots of Haglers punches did a lot of damage that wasnt visible (i know it may sound dumb) but Leonard did a good job not showing when he took a good punch
     
  4. Synthetic Decay

    Synthetic Decay Active Member Full Member

    576
    0
    Dec 28, 2012


    Ring craft, elusiveness, counters and leads. Marv was just plodding forward, winging punches for the first half of the fight, during five he started getting sharper.
     
  5. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,639
    2,093
    Aug 26, 2004
    close fight but Hagler got out hustled with end of round flurries,shoeshine flurries....Dundee and SRL had a plan and stuck to it....I thought Marvin did enough to win but did not live up to expectations...meat and potatoes vs smoke and mirrors
     
  6. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,295
    510
    Feb 17, 2010
    Smoke and mirrors.Jesus christ.
     
  7. Synthetic Decay

    Synthetic Decay Active Member Full Member

    576
    0
    Dec 28, 2012
    Smoke and mirrors = making your opponent plod towards you missing punches while you evade and counter.

    Marv ****ed himself in this fight, strange tactics and mixed with the prefight talk, he dug a hole. Given the fact that Leonard was a career welter, credit to him even if Marv did manage to edge it. I don't remember Marv fighting many light heavies.
     
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,811
    Aug 26, 2011
    To act like there were no smoke and mirrors going on in that that fight isn't being genuine. There most certainly was. That was the totality of Ray's work or even most of it.. but there was certainly plenty of that going on none the less. I guess the same people that think there wasn't.. are the same people who gave the frist 6 rounds to SRL...
     
  9. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,295
    510
    Feb 17, 2010
    He fought a safety-first fight by his standards and in spurts by his standards, there's no doubt about that.He obviously no longer had the stamina and overall physical ability he once had.

    But the whole "tricked the judges" "30 second flurries" "played to the crowd while Hagler did the effective work" rhetoric that has floated around this for so long are tiresome and ridiculously overplayed.

    Smoke and mirrors? I'm not even sure i understand what that means related to something in-ring He was punching Hagler in the face!

    If anything as unforgiven said, it was that one scorecard that was deceitful.If the fix was in and Leonard was complicit i doubt we'll ever know.
     
  10. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    I agree..Out in front after 6 minus 1 round.
     
  11. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Yes but Haglar did nothing to stop those fluries.
     
  12. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012

    Good point S!..:good
     
  13. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Ive been waiting for someone to recognize the great comeback..And at MW no doubt.
     
  14. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,811
    Aug 26, 2011
    You act like these flurries ACTUALLY landed the majority of the punches or ACTUALLY did something to hagler.. Neither of which is true. Most of the time they were blocked or didn't land. Sure, some got in there, but most didn't land. But to the crowd.. they got all excited and started screaming about a lot of stuff that didn't land. Point is, why do you need to stop, or more importantly, why are these flurries that didn't land much weighed so heavily. That is the bone of contention here imo.
     
  15. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012

    Why!?...Because Leonard won the fight...thats what the judges saw rather you like it or not...:|