just remember: if calzaghe wins, he beat a 43 year old guy!!

So he's not 43? He's just making this stuff up now?

 

This fight isn't unfair because Hopkins is old. It's unfair because Calzaghe is BETTER than Hopkins. Prime for Prime Calzaghe takes him.

Roy Jones says Joe would have given him trouble in his prime.

 

:nut

I bet you think a prime Calzaghe would whoop up on a prime Roy Jones and James Toney too huh? How about a prime God?

 

You'll see pal Hopkins is going to wishing he was back in the prison picking up the powdered soap again

:admin

 

No Toney and RJJ take him. Same way they would take Hopkins

 

It doesn't really matter. If people pick Hopkins knowing he's 43 they are have made their bed and come saturday it will be time to lie in it when Joe dominates him

If the age really is such a factor for the author why is he asking "if" Joe wins. He doesn't exactly sound certain. He's just starting the discrediting game early, there is nothing else to it

 

stanley matthews won european footballer of the year at 40

hopkins beat tarver who simply showed he is a very ood boxer recently.

to use his age as an excuse is a joke because there is no proof that it has had any effect on him,because joe's style is so much based on speed and workrate i would say that his age is actually more relevant than a defensive counter puncher in hopkins.

 

She looked at me funny

:deal

 

Just remember he beat the real LHW Champion. If that happens:good

No excuses, boith men are true champions bringing it. I expect a great fight regardless of the winner:yep

 

Exactly, Bhop is #1 LHW on his own turf and has come off some good wins. No excuses