just rewatched berto vs. collazo

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Medicine, May 21, 2009.


  1. brownshell

    brownshell Active Member Full Member

    759
    4
    Dec 11, 2006
    It was a very close fight and desrving of rematch. I thought Berto 11th and 12th rounds were strong and he had Collazo hurt in the last round. This was Berto's first nip and tuck battle. He showed heart in coming up bigger in the championship rounds and is the reason he won.
     
  2. boricua100%

    boricua100% Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,748
    0
    Dec 15, 2008
  3. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Collazo did not whoop Berto. I had it 114-113 doe Collazo so I cant aruge with 114-113 for Berto. If Collazo wins the last round hes champ, that simple and he didnt when his croner said when need this round
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    :lol:That's my scorecard is the night of the fight.

    8-4.

    It seems closer cause of the 10-8. berto clearly won.
     
  5. TroubleLurks

    TroubleLurks **** spell check Full Member

    2,765
    0
    May 23, 2006
    I don't know what's worse...this scoring or the fact that you're ok with sharing it.:huh
     
  6. 555east

    555east Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,948
    0
    Oct 24, 2007

    certainly truth to the bold, however those last 2 rounds hurt Collazo dearly. But he still put up a good effort in losing.

    granted every round is worth the same (10 points)

    but losing the last 2 rounds of a fight, obviously came back to bite Luis.

    and I don't see how anyone can call this fight.

    A. A robbery, as 2 judges scored it 114-113 indicates with the constancy that this was a competitive close, fight ... for the TS, if Collazo really "wiped" him out, the scorecards would have indicated so. And Collazo would have won more rounds ... no if ands or buts.

    and B. Collazo gave away rounds ... as some have said before the last 2, but also I think the 5th and 6th he had low punch out puts.

    but take into consideration that a fighter (Collazo) is giving up rounds (6, 11, 12) and he loses by ONE point on 2 scorecards ... how is that a robbery?

    if anyone got robbed, it was Collazo doing it to himself, for giving up those rounds.

    and in a close fight, you can't do that.

    **if people can use knockdowns to justify a fighter getting the win .. i.e. Pacquiao vs Marquez

    then why can't giving up rounds be fair enough logic to say Berto beat Collazo

    cuz no Andre didn't dominate Collazo by ANY means, but he won that fight, (according to the judges) by winning more rounds.
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Berto definately won that fight. I think i had it 8 rounds to 4
     
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    :lol: Scorecard from the night of the fight. I'll rescore it today.

    Lot of the people had the same scorecard.
     
  9. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Same Score 8-4 Berto clear as day. I would love to see the rounds people scored for Collazo.
     
  10. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    I really enjoy people telling me I'm wrong but refuse to post a scorecard.
     
  11. Money7

    Money7 The Best Full Member

    1,440
    2
    Oct 6, 2004
    berto won the fight in a very close fight... good ups to collazo though.. he would be tough for anyone in the 147 division right now...
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008


    .....Home Box Office