Just rewatched froch v direll...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by socrates, Jan 4, 2010.


  1. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    iv never seen such a display of ***gotry by a 'fighter' like that before,the only rounds direll wasnt trying to give froch head were the rounds in which he was doing his seabiscuit impersonation,had he been training with tyson gay beforehand??

    he was even holding froch's hand post fight,now i have nothing against this civil partnership stuff but leave it in the locker room fella's...

    exposed you *** where are you?
     
  2. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    He still won more rounds of the fight, ****** or no.
     
  3. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    Froch lost to a ***.
     
  4. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    :lol: Really a display of how much better an inexperienced but good fighter is than a supposedly world class fighter like Froch who isnt good.
     
  5. ranser

    ranser Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,755
    0
    Jun 6, 2008
    i thought dirrel won the fight
     
  6. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    remind me never to watch a direll fight again in future,stop holding on and fecking fight you big girls blouse,direll won ****! except an invitation to a 'gaylords unite against facism' rally....
     
  7. punk

    punk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,112
    7
    May 23, 2009
    Im a Froch fan and thought Direll won the fight fare and square.
     
  8. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Dirrell has skill but he didn't cover himself in glory in my opinion. Froch was just as bad but at least forced the fight. At times Dirrell literally went down without even being touched.
     
  9. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    Dirrell showed in parts that he could outclass Froch, but I didn't believe at the time that he showed it often enough for people to be screaming robbery, and I don't believe it now.
     
  10. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    where are the usual suspects??
     
  11. lanzelotz

    lanzelotz Member Full Member

    418
    0
    Oct 20, 2009
    then try the last Vitali Klitschko fight. He fought against (what was his name again?)

    I thought Dirrel won, but the people that claim Froch won have a good point too. It was just a messy and close fight.
     
  12. Silent_Assassin

    Silent_Assassin Lightning Full Member

    1,229
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    Dirrel won the fight but he's the ****** because froch and the judges raped him....interesting
     
  13. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Close fight but it's impossible to give the belt to a man with no desire to fight. I thought a harsh ref could have disqualified Dirrell for the amount of holding and running he did. I appreciate good boxing but this wasn't it. Terrible fight and Froch did himself no favours. I did think he deserved the nod but only just.

    Dirrell should have had his purse withheld.
     
  14. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Dirrell schooled Froch's ass, but the running angered me too. Dirrell was getting the best of it whenever they went toe to toe, how can any real fighter run away when you are beating the other guy at practically everything.
     
  15. rickx1

    rickx1 Legend Full Member

    3,183
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    Dirrel lost 118-110 on my card, the running didn't help much either:lol:
    :good