Just rewatched Marquez Pacquiao 3, Marquez won 116-112

I just re watched the 3rd fight again and I had the same score i had the first time. Marquez won 116-112. This was a clear robbery. There is no way you can logically say Pacquiao won this fight. Pacquiao did not do enough for this to even be a draw.

First of Marquez landed by far the much cleaner punches. He was the ring general as he dictated the pace of the fight and was controlling the distance of the fight. Also he displayed better defense. And he made sure Pacquiao aggression was ineffective. Points are awarded for effective aggression not solely aggression and Pacquiao aggression was not effective. Marquez counter punching limited Pacquiao aggression to just being aggressive. When ever Pacquiao landed a shot, Marquez came back at him with 1 or 2 more and many times he stopped pacquiao in his tracks. That is not effective aggression so you cant give pacquiao points for that.

This compubox is bull****. Firstly you judge a fight round to round basis on Clean punching, Ring generalship, Defense, Effective Aggression not on stupid compubox stats, if compubox stats meant anything we wouldn't have judges we would just wait for the stats to come out and declare a winner. Compubox is a very flawed, its a guy on button clicking by what he judges is a punch and compubox do not take into account the effectiveness of a punch. so this nonsense about idiots claiming Pacquiao won because of compubox needs to stop.

Finally these idiots who claim Marquez didn't win because he didn't beat the champ decisively are morons. Firstly this isn't an official rule and this notion of decisively beating the champ ended in the 1950s and Judges are actually taught for years that technically you are not a champ when the bell rings, you literally give up the belt and both guys are fighting for the belt. The idea of just giving the champ rounds because he champ is nonsense.