Just rewatched pascal vs hopkins on demand and i must say....

Maybe, maybe not. I had it 116-110 for B-HOP because I really felt he won every of the rounds aside those 10-8 rounds that I scored to Pascal, I just think the 2nd and the 8th rounds are debatable, so the scorecard still favors B-HOP 114-112, is more than clear that he won, close or wide margin, he won. But I knew he will not get a win in Canada as soon as he was KD in the 1st round.

 

How can you give de fifth round to Hopkins? You guys are ****ing crazy and have no credibility whatsoever.

 

Like some gave the first five to Pascal, like some gave the 12th to Pascal. That's the way I saw it and, like I said, despite the score being close or wide, B-HOP won the fight.

 

people on ESB can't score for ****

rounds 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12 were all close. How the **** you gonna say Hopkins dominated apart from the knockdowns

 

He did not. It's a draw. 1-2-3-5-8 for Pascal with 2 kd's. I have the same card as 2 juges. If you wanna see a robbery, take a look at Alexander-Kotelnik.

 

I agree except for round 4 and 5. Round 4 was a good round for Hopkins and Pascal clearly won the fifth.

 

I agree that 2 and 8 were close, but most of the time the people got fooled with the flurries that Pascal threw and that made it a close round when B-HOP dominated most of the round, simply one or two flurries don't change the round to me. You can find many posters here that saw B-HOP dominating from 5-12, others from 6-11, the thing is that Hopkins won a lot of consecutive rounds and won more rounds than Pascal(including on the scorecards from the official judges who were there scoring it) regardless of the KD's. The KD's made it a close fight, but it really wasn't.

 

how can anyone not have respect for hopkins?

sure the guy talks a lot of **** and lives in a partial fantasy world, and if he wasn't a great defensive fighter he'd be in a world of trouble years ago.

but he is a great defensive fighter, make that a great fighter period, and the discipline it takes to be on form and dedicated at 46 years of age is worthy of anyone's admiration.

 

I made a thread about the scoring and 40% voted that B-HOP won by more than 2 pts. 30% says it was a draw, 27.5% that B-HOP won 114-112 and 2.5%(1 voter) said that Pascal won.

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=8500131

As for Alexander-Kotelnik, yet the majority saw Kotelnik winning while I saw the fight even at 114-114.

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=245988

 

Why did you give the fifth to Hopkins? Because of 2 body shots in the first minute? :huh Pascal landed some vicious shots in that round. You can't be serious , go watch that round again.

 

Tarver scored it for pascal..remember what the score was?

 

:think There's nothing to do with you.

 

well I scored the 4th for Hopkins but even alot of people who scored the fight to Hopkins gave Pascal the 4th, including the American judge.

 

114-112

 

Like I said in french forum, expectation was to high for Pascal, people was dissapointing that he wasn't washing Hopkins face. Because people still doesn't respect Hopkins(How it's possible).

When people will compare Pascal with other Hopkins opponent replay. They will realize one thing, both fighter diserved credit, Hopkins is still a hell of fighter with an awesome foot work and Pascal for the first time of Hopkins career, hurt him for so many times. Pascal landed all the best power shot through the night. (I don't take anything from Hopkins)

It's sad people been following Hopkins baby critics. Because to me this fight was epic, Hopkins could have his rematch without crying like a baby, Pascal proved before, is always up to the best challenge. Not like some boxers we all know...

Why we always have to find contreversial, I think this fight is history.