Even Byrd gave GGG round 4 it was that obvious. R1 was close... i gave it to GGG R2 + R3 I gave to Canelo R4-R9 was all GGG... Canelo spent most of these rounds on his bike fighting in little bursts R10 Canelo...just R11 GGG R12 Canelo...just All in all 116-112 GGG. I could see 115-113 or 117-111 but no way a draw or Canelo win.
Yep. After I saw this post, I thought this was him! Instead of writing ****ing essays no one is going to read. Literally no one read this bro. I'll give you a better way to argue. Just point out every punch landed for canelo and the timestamp, and tell a GGG fan to do that for him too.
I said I was OK with the 114-114 scorecard for Floyd Canelo, that doesn't mean I scored it that myself or thought that it actually was a draw.
Good idea, but that takes a little bit longer. It's easier to just watch and type it and reference times occasionally. But you're right it would be better if I timestamed every punch thrown landed, just takes longer.
That takes longer? LOL no it doesn't. You watch a 3 minute round and occasionally time stamp for one guy within taht 3 minutes. It doesn't as long as the essays you write bro.
Understand that there are people who thought Floyd won the fight 12-0 or 11-1. How is that any better?
I get what you're saying, but it's not as easy as it sounds, because you then have to decide which ones to list and timestamp. By just typing it out like I did, I don't have to make those decisions. Still I challenge any Triple G fan to timestamp his best punches in Round 4 and I'll counter that with timestamps of Canelo's best punches in Round 4.
Way more plausible than 114-114. But you exposed yourself here. You thought 12-0 or 11-1 is bad, so your justified in saying 114-114 as a Canelo dickrider since you think the other side made a dumb statement. Inb4 you write essays so you can get the last word, since you know you literally have countless hours on your hand, while others can't be bothered to read and respond to such long posts.
You're the one making the argument though disagreeing with the majority. So you should list it first. This is your thread after all so you provide the evidence. And let's be honest, you do have the time to do this.
To be honest though. If people were not aware of your past like me(I mean I remember arguing with you, but I forgot your name, and someone had to bring it up to me for me to remember), I felt like you were being treated wrong. Saying that Canelo won isn't as ******ed as you saying you don't disagree with 114-114. The reason I defended is because I thought your claims of Canelo winning was fair(even though I disagreed), and people were name calling. However if they clearly knew about your Canelo dickriding history, I don't blame them at all for going at you, and I regret defending you. My bad @Dfaulds if this is the case.
I mean I did list all the punches, yes I probably should have been more thorough and provided all time stamps, too but I'm not a machine lol.
Bro you have time. If you really want to convince people. Do the time stamps. You know that literally no one read that essay you wrote right? Like literally no one beside yourself to proofread(if you even did this).