It’s attempted robbery, not robbery. If everyone agrees Usyk won, and all 3 judges score Usyk the winner giving him a unanimous decision victory, then who or what exactly was robbed? Stop trying so hard to be victimised on Usyk’s behalf. Usyk himself rated his performance against Chisora as a 3/10.
All the judges scored it in favor of Usyk, just as it is fair at first sight. Yet, two of them scored it almost a draw which is absolutely out of the reality, so in such sense - yes, Usyk was a victim of the well known corruption or whatever you like to call it, in boxing. Even if we exclude the smaller ring while every knowledgeable person knows why it was that way.
Yeah if Chisora somehow managed to do a bit more in just a round, he would have gotten a draw. Yeah maybe we can call it an unsuccessful attempt of robbery or highly paid/biased judges. It's the same. Whether the right guy win or not, when cards are b.c., we should call it like it is.