Wlad has been at the top or near the top for nearly 20 years now. Incredible longevity and incredible offensive fighter in his prime. Tremendous fighter.
Yeah that was pretty funny sometimes to watch. Lol Although it could be frustrating at times. Manny pissed off Wlad before the 12th in the Chambers fight and then Wlad put Chambers to sleep for 5 minutes. LOL! My God... If Emanuel was still here to be the the corner for the Fury fight, we would have seen Manny even more ticked off than he was for Lewis v.s Tyson!
It wasn't a domination at all. He won 3 rounds out of a 12 round fight... Brewster smashed him to bits and won. He dominated Wlad. Wlad dominated Brewster ??
Take away his illegal holding tactics and Haye would have knocked him spark out. He dominates with holding... not the jab , not the right hand...With Bear hugging!. He couldn't even dominate Jennings when the NYC athletic commission forced him to fight under the rules "Gary Shaw, the Wayne resident whose Totowa company promotes Jennings, has expressed his concerns about Klitschko’s holding to New York State Athletic Commission executive director David Berlin. He assured Shaw that the referee, who hasn’t been announced, will remind Klitschko (63-3, 53 KOs) in his dressing room that excessive holding won’t be tolerated." The novice Jennings who isn't very good had him running all over the ring and hanging on for deal life. Wladimir sucks kid. Its a fact.
He never produced a jabbing clinic against a half decent opponent in his life. The only guy he ever controlled with the jab was Brewster in the rematch. Whats impressive about that? Brewster came out of the hospital after a long injury induced retirement. If i remember correctly he wasn't granted a license to box in America anymore. The first fight was prime vs prime and Wlad was unsuccessful controlling him and keeping him on the outside using the jab. He couldn't even keep walking stump Sam Peter on the out side of his jab in two fights. Watch Lewis shut Tua out with the jab. Tua was 10x better than Peters. Then go watch Wlad against Peter get bounced up and down while he runs away in a chronic state of panic. The only thing that saved him from a knock out loss was the fact he desperately held onto to Peter like a scared cat stuck up a tree. In TWO FIGHTS. Anybody who can't out box a bum like Sam Peter and has to hold on for dear life is a total fraud. James Toney handled Peter easier than Wlad did.. Fat, old , out of shape little James Toney....Let that sink in.
He did the same thing thing with brock , alot of his fights could have ended early had he used the left hook more another punch Steward thought Wlad was the best at .
You are being dishonest again. The facts are these, yes Brewster turned the fight on its head but he was losing every round prior. It was a jabbing clinic. This is a statement of fact no matter how much fiction u like to peddle. Look at it without emotion and hatred and in all those rounds Brewster has fought with WK in two fights he probably only won 1! The round in which he stopped Wlad. Objective people can look for themselves . They are on YT. I say AGAIN: Brewster caught him with some stunning hooks and turned the fight on its head. This is HW boxing it is not unusual and many great jabbers like Lewis too have been caught. It does not diminish that weapon that unreasonable people like you think the fact that it is negated maybe 5% of the time should take precedent over the other 95%. Now repeat that back to me so I can make sure you understand!
Again just more nonsense. We are onto Jennings now are we! Another guy who LOST! I saw no excessive clinching versus Haye. Povetkin yes. Haye. No. I saw Haye get out jabbed and lose. I don't care what Gary Shaw says son! Now do you think if we were to take away Klitschkos jab in this fight Haye would still have lost? I don't.. It was the factor here. Not the clinching. Be honest or stop wasting my time u dodo bird..
Another loss. Peter. Twice in fact! Haye. Brewster. All lost this. This is fact. Your vitriol on a forum will not change this. Learn to embrace this. Holding? Yes he holds. I have seen far worse holding at HW than the Peter fight. Ali, Ruiz... Citing Lewis to help you cope with him better emotionally will not help. Now.. Brewster, Haye, Peter, Jennings? Who won? The jab is the true weapon of Klitschko’s dominance. . Another jabbing clinic was the Rahman fight. There is zero elbow flare, Rahman just doesn’t have the time to defend against this job because of the technical perfection of the shot. Any young fighters wanting to know how to jab properly, this is the fight to watch. I don’t need to point out times, there’s barely 5 seconds go by without him slamming home this javelin of a shot. Yes a very very excellent display in effective jabbing here. I'm almost semi erect.. Now repeat that back to me so I can make sure you understand!!
What 12 round fight? One fight went 5 and the other went 6. Are you going senile? You can't even get basic facts correct let alone understand or accept the scoring of the two fights.
You clearly never watched the fight in full.. Turn the highlight reels off dummy and actually watch his fights from start to end. WK won 3 rounds -1 , 2 and 4. Round 3 was a big round for Brewster. Round 4 was the only round WK dominated. Round 5 Brewster dominated and Wlad couldn't handle any more of it . He got destroyed. Only one guy dominated that fight and it wasn't the guy the guy down on all fours kissing the canvas.
LoL. Rahman was shot to bits fool. To makes it worse he took the fight on two weeks notice. That old man didn't even have a training camp behind him going into that fight. It doesn't take much to impress a Kturd does it? 'Jabbing clinic' lmao Go watch Williams vs Berbick if you want to see a jabbing clinic.. Williams dominated Berbick with just a jab. He won round after round with just a jab. Hypothetical situation - Take all Wlads tools away from him and put him into the ring with just the use of his jab. Who do you think he could beat ? There's no doubt in my mind Peters would take him out in the first round. Hell , even Leapai would get him out of there at some point. Put Larry Homles in there against Peter with just his jab and he'd still white wash him 12 - nothing. Easily. At 45 Holmes had nothing left but his jab and it almost won him the WBC belt against McCall. MaCall would be one of Wlads best wins , if not his best win. Go do some homework. Wlads jab barely makes the top 10 list of HWs jabs.
I'm the dummy? You have just readily admitted you watch Klitschko fights, a fighter u do not value. You cite his opponents LOSING to him to support your flaky arguments LOL You HL Brewster KO'ing Wlad yet can't even get the facts correct or cite the correct amount of rounds they went down, & if I'm so dumb then why are you making excuses for a man who doesn't make any himself: “He was able to maintain the jab whereas the last time I knew his jab would be busy but I was able to get past it. In the second fight his jab was better, he had an awesome jab and I tried to get past it but I couldn’t. So then he was accumulating punches. I knew, at some point, I couldn’t keep getting hit like that. I felt I was the same in both fights but he was better that night.” -Brewster In fact let's remember how irrelevant you are and actually ask some of the men who fought him: [url]http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/what-is-it-like-to-fight-wladimir-klitschko/6/[/url] Let's see how boxing media outlets like bleacherreport viewed his jab when he was at the top of his game: [url]http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/1748793-ranking-the-10-best-jabs-in-boxing-today[/url] And I seriously worry about your comprehension skills you dense twat.. I said Klitschko was dominating the fight up until the come from behind KO. This is fact. He win most of if not all the rounds up until the stoppage and DROPPED Brewster too. He out landed Brewster also go check the punch stats. Here is the fight report: [url]http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Lamon_Brewster_vs._Wladimir_Klitschko_(1st_meeting)[/url] As I said Klitschko was dominating and out jabbing Brewster. You offered me nothing with your latest response and nothing that I readily haven't already acknowledged.