Just watched Pacquiao vs Diaz again and I didn't remember

how many posters have you probed Divac?

 

I see you throw *******s here and there... so i think that's about fair.

Again theres logical pac critics like acb, kg, brooklyn... theres also guys like amsterdam and company who are obviously haters. And theres you... a loyal JMM fans who got his own agend. That's how i see...

 

The agenda for me is to make my points clear that JMM imo is the better fighter....complete, P4P, and overall.....those that dont agree often times call me a Pac hater.

....but believe me, thats not a knock on Pac as a great fighter. To see JMM as the better fighter is not to hate on Pac, or vice versa.

My full respect and appreciation of Manny Pacquiao as a great fighter is all I can really say!

 

If I remember correctly, many were saying Manny would be annihilated before the fight; that he's got no chance against Diaz; that Diaz is big, strong, the champion, etc..But, after the fight these same critiques were downplaying Diaz as if though he's not a legitimate fighter at all, that he does not belong to the ring...then, why the heck was he a champion for and an olympian too...?

 

you're gonna make this thread long again divac

 

Pac is a bad man. So will the winner of Hatton-Malignaggi fight Pac next?

 

I've been around this forum for several years now.....and some of my better arguments and heated debates have come against Sweet_Scientist who is as big a Pernell Whitaker fan as PacDbest is a Pac fan, only Scientist is much more knowleadgeable and reasonable when it comes to debate.

Scientist and I rarely agree on anything related to boxing, but our discussions in the classic section on Chavez vs Whitaker are almost legendary.

.....instead of resorting to namecalling on our obvious and clear cut disagreements, we question and probe every nook and cranny as to why we think the way we do.
..... at the end of debate, we still disagree, but it makes for great debate, and gets others informed and involved in the thread.

I tell you, there is nothing like good sound debate where both sides of the argument respect the others right to argue and make their points!

 

Is'nt it what good debate is about?

I'm here to educate my friend!


.....and in the process, I'm often find myself learning new things, so I get educated! :good

 

Heres the thing... people like bulakenyo and other newbs here will see you as what you want them to see. You always make sure you're politacally correct when you're dissin pac so not to ruin you rep...

But like every other politcian you do have your own agenda, and that is to put down pac so you can pull your idol JMM up. Unfortunately your track record shows that your love for JMM makes you a borderline hater.

You are the type of person that will only give him credit when he finally loses to JMM. :deal

 

Actually this thread kinda more intellectual than the rest.... no one is fighting through emoticons.

By the way, I always felt pissed when I was called a *******... yet I almost never post exclusively about Pac.

 

great performance by Pac no doubt. Not his best but one of them.

 

I agree:deal

 

At best, he is a b-level contender who is firmly established at 135.

I think the way he beat him up that badly was unexpected, and impressive, considering that it was his 1st fight at 135.