Just watched the fight again and you know what?....................

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by swedeone, Sep 29, 2007.


Page 1 of 2
  1. swedeone

    swedeone Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,227
    3
    Dec 4, 2004
    Those three judges should be BANNED for their ridiculous scorecards. What a fuccing joke. Pavlik landed more jabs, more power shots and was clearly the aggressor. I am a Pavlik fan and had Kelly up by 1 point going into the last round. You want to tell me I was off in a round?... I'm fine with that. Off in 2 rounds?.... not likely, but possible I suppose. Wrong in 3 or 4 rounds and thus almost having Taylor with a shut-out? That's criminal and absolutely ridiculous. There is ZERO chance that fight was a 4 point advantage for Taylor. Z-E-R-O. :-(
     
    swedeone, Sep 29, 2007
    swedeone, Sep 29, 2007
    #1
  2. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    I had Pavlik up 4 rounds to 2, but I thought 3 round even would be a good scorecard as well.
     
    brooklyn1550, Sep 29, 2007
    brooklyn1550, Sep 29, 2007
    #2
  3. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I agreed with Lederman's card tonight, Pavlik up 4-2 going into the seventh with the KD round.
     
    Amsterdam, Sep 29, 2007
    Amsterdam, Sep 29, 2007
    #3
  4. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,860
    3,103
    Apr 16, 2005
    What do you expect. Just like in the Hopkins and Wright fights, HBOs judges had their cards filled out for Taylor in advance.

    Sorry, HBO, no gift decisions THIS time! Pavlik saw to that!! :happy
     
    Zakman, Sep 29, 2007
    Zakman, Sep 29, 2007
    #4
  5. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Brooklyn, many congratulations on a pin point, perfect prediction. Nobody would have gotten that KD, but your overall analysis was perfectly spot on and I am throughly impressed.:good
     
    Amsterdam, Sep 29, 2007
    Amsterdam, Sep 29, 2007
    #5
  6. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    had JT up by 2 rnds...
     
    boxbox, Sep 29, 2007
    boxbox, Sep 29, 2007
    #6
  7. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    :rofl

    Hey Zak did you see Lampley's face? After the post-fight interviews Lennox had a look on his face like he just caught Lamps doing the drunken sailor speak. And Lampley looked none-too-pleased. :smoke
     
    Ambition_Def, Sep 29, 2007
    Ambition_Def, Sep 29, 2007
    #7
  8. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,289
    19
    Sep 21, 2006
    Taylor was clearly winning
     
    Boom_Boom, Sep 29, 2007
    Boom_Boom, Sep 29, 2007
    #8
  9. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Your theory would hold true if they weren't hyping Pavlik as much or more than Taylor.

    Sorry, this theory simply isn't true man.
     
    kg0208, Sep 29, 2007
    kg0208, Sep 29, 2007
    #9
  10. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,225
    1,635
    Sep 13, 2006
    Completely agree with Zakman. I had Pavlik up 4-2. He was landing way more solidly and consistently and was backing up Jermain. Other than the knockdown round, Jermain was hardly landing, Kelly was rolling and dipping, and when Kelly landed, they were solid - right on the jaw. I was surprised Jermain took it as well and as long as he did, and quite frankly was impressed at how well he conned Kelly, because I thought he was hurt on a number of occasions from rights but played it off relatively well. Bottom line though, is the mind can be tough, but the body will give way if you keep getting hit that cleanly and consistently.
     
    apollack, Sep 29, 2007
    apollack, Sep 29, 2007
    #10
  11. brick city

    brick city Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Oct 12, 2006
    Taylor has gone down hill since teaming up with Stewart.
     
    brick city, Sep 29, 2007
    brick city, Sep 29, 2007
    #11
  12. GARCIA

    GARCIA New Member Full Member

    0
    1
    Mar 20, 2005
    Was the female judge related to Harold Lederman by any chance?

    Just curious.......
     
    GARCIA, Sep 29, 2007
    GARCIA, Sep 29, 2007
    #12
  13. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    Although I picked Taylor to win. I really dislike him, just because of what happened vs. Hopkins and Wright.
     
    Napoleon, Sep 29, 2007
    Napoleon, Sep 29, 2007
    #13
  14. itliangladiator

    itliangladiator Active Member Full Member

    905
    1
    Jan 11, 2007
    Jermain even told Merchant he didn't know he was winning.
     
    itliangladiator, Sep 29, 2007
    itliangladiator, Sep 29, 2007
    #14
  15. PeterNielsen70

    PeterNielsen70 Active Member Full Member

    724
    0
    Jun 23, 2007
    Taylor - Pavlik
    1. 10 - 10
    2. 10 - 8
    3. 9 - 10
    4. 9 - 10
    5. 10 - 9
    6. 10 - 9

    So Taylor in front by 2 p. according to my scorecard. :bbb But the rounds were pretty even.
     
    PeterNielsen70, Sep 29, 2007
    PeterNielsen70, Sep 29, 2007
    #15
Page 1 of 2