The only good thing about it is when there gettin ground pounded,but above esle its pretty much crap.
Whats the difference between the 2? Well 1 is unarmed combat between 2 men. The others you described either involved using a weapon or getting some help from mates. Both very different.
That one decision was horrible. The fight with the deaf guy and the smaller dude. Mike or john whatever their names were I cant remember. The deaf guy in the blue shouldve had that decision. The MMA judges are as shitty as the boxing judges.
If you don't like the UFC or MMA thats all well and good. But you've gotta be a complete **** nut to sit there a watch it for 3 hours if you have this much bad **** to say about it. That shows you are either a complete ****** or you don't want to admit you like MMA. It was a good card. Decent scraps..good showcase of Mix Martial Arts and of course Knock outs. I'm more in to boxing as well, but I dig MMA when the fights are worth watching.
So you think Liddell/Jardine is bad matchup? Why? Chuck was champ in UFC for a long time. Jardine almost certainly isn't as good, but he's an exciting figher and could pose trouble to Liddell. Please clarify what makes this such a bad matchup. And if you think Quinton Jackson is a nobody, then you need to do a little homework. Jackson is a very talented guy, who was a star in Pride for years. And the Bispig fight was very troubling. I felt it was an obvious victory for Hammill. Let's hope this isn't a trend, or soon UFC will start to suffer credibility problems the same way boxing has due to all the questionable decisions over the years.
i like MMA and i like Rampage and I tuned in to see what was supposed to be an exciting unification match up and instead i got a **** poor, lackluster show. they need Fedor vs. Randy now since that's the only MMA fight out there that actually has my attention and I'm sure would go over big. But overall, UFC 75 was pretty lame
Comparing a board game to combat sports is pretty lame and makes your point even more ******ed. If you prefer one sport over the other has nothing to do with "intellectual capacity"....it has everything to do with preference. There are pros and cons to both sports and a fan of fighting should be open minded enough to appreciate both.
oh please, he landed more than a few punches. And if he didn't do anything to deserve the match, what did Henderson do to deserve it? Granted he was in control for maybe a round or two at most, but anyone watching that fight with two working eyes knows Rampage won.
LOL...What are you talking about. the Hammil v Bisbing decision was bogus but they got the decision right with Rampage and Henderson. Henderson just didn't do enough to win and Rampage controlled the marjority of the action. IT was competitive but Rampage did more than enough to win the decision. I had it 3 rounds to 2 for Quinton. The only round that Henderson CLEARY won was 1, other than that all the rounds were close but edged by Quinton aside from 3rd round.
I understand what you're getting at, but your analogy doesn't make as much sense as you think it does. In boxing, you are LIMITED to your hands, regardless of what physical advantages your opponent may have over you. No matter if your opponent is taller, stronger, faster or all of the above, you have to use your hands to beat him. MMA on the other hand allows smaller opponents to use wrestling skills against taller big men that would generally have somewhat of an advantage in boxing.
you automatically disqualify yourself from any further judgement on anything if you honestly think Rampage did not land one punch. That is stupid beyond stupid.
Rampage landed a few punches while he was on top! He landed one or two standing. Grant it....it wasn't a lot nor was it anything CLEAN but Henderson did LESS. He looked good with his strikes but he didn't land much on Rampage. It was a competitive bout....it was more tatical than anything else but Rampage had the better game plan and implemented his game plan more effectively. he was able to keep control of the bout by keeping Dan on his back which was VERY impressive. And if Dan did landed CLEAN punches on Rampage we wouldn't be having this discussion! Dan would be the UFC and Pride champ by way of KO. Dan didn't land anything clean and neither did Rampage. What we do know is that Rampage CONTROLLED the fight and kept Dan on his back which isn't an easy thing to do. Dan is more than capable of KOing Quinton with his power and the same goes with Quinton.....the fact of the matter is neither of them were able to land that night ending punch...Quinton won on being the more "Effective aggressor".
