Kalule vs Finnegan & Seales

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Tin_Ribs, Oct 3, 2010.


  1. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,259
    Feb 6, 2009
    :goodboth were good wins
     
  2. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,456
    4,091
    Jun 28, 2009
    What did you make of him (Finnegan) in comparison to Minter, lora? I prefer to watch Finnegan of the two and I thought he at least deserved to win the second fight. Minter is a fighter I've tried to like but just can't, despite what he achieved. Just something about his style that puts me off.
     
  3. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,456
    4,091
    Jun 28, 2009
    That they were.
     
  4. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
    I'd say they were on roughly the same level overall.A more consistent determination, higher workrate and better punching power is what saw Minter have the more consistent career.

    Agree i'd rather watch Finnegan as a technician.Minter was only occasionally aesthetically pleasing, a lot of the time when he opens up with his shots, he reminds me of a more traditional standup Pacman, just in the awkward rhythm of the straight punching and footwork.
     
  5. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,456
    4,091
    Jun 28, 2009
    Minter was a very good fighter and I certainly respect his work ethic, grit and effectiveness. Thought he served himself better when he steadily pressed things rather than boxing too much on the back foot tbh.

    Funny that you mention the slight Pacquiao comparison. I was recently trying to explain Minter to a mate of mine who doesn't really watch boxing much when another fella who watches it even less cut in and said 'He were a bit like that little Pacquiao bloke but not as good'. I sort of told him to stop being a tool, so outlandish seemed the comparison at the time, but you've got me wondering a bit now :oops:........the odd similarity perhaps might be there at times.