Kathy Duva Disses Golovkin's resume, Says Kovalev is better. I Agree!

She is correct. Kovalev doesn't even have as many fights as Golovkin, and his resume is still better.

Wonder if it's Duva, or Kovalev's manager who is giving him such meager portions of his fight purses though?

 

He's got the better resume, however, she's exaggerating a bit as well about how good it is.

 

Of course it is. Most people have a better resume than GGG. Lol.

 

GGG is living well off bums, his new nickname should be Bumdog millionaire.

 

Thanks to Hopkins & Pascal having the cojones to get in the ring with Kovalev maybe his resume reads slightly better than Golovkin's. Pity El Pollo & Pretty in Pink don't have the same cojones . No 160 pounder shows any interest in meeting GGG coz they fear they'll get their asses kicked

 

Golovkin is the better fighter but i agree Kovalev has a better resume at the moment

but Kovalev's resume isn't that great either his best win's are old Hopkins and Pascal (the guy who lost vs old Hopkins)

 

Kovalev would kick his **** if they fought. Old Hopkins trumps anything on Golovkin's resume. Not sure why Pascal gets thrown out there like he was something great at the time Kovalev beat him. That version of Pascal is nothing but a contender. Along the lines of the Martin Murray scalp that Golovkin has.

 

He did beat Bute though just prior, far more convincingly than DeGale as well IMO. Though you can argue how confident he was going into both of those bouts.

 

Except Wilder :hey

 

Are you kidding? Golovkin will win the fight with Kovalev, GGG is overall way better fighter than Kovalev the only difference is size which still won't be a problem. If you had been watching GGG amateur career you probably will understand that GGG will use totally different tactics against Kovalev as GGG has a lot to offer in terms of style and abilities.

Kovalev is lucky, first of all Hopkins collected titles and went in to fight with Kovalev, would it be someone like Mayweather, Ward, Cotto, Kovalev would be still sitting in situation like he was previously waiting for his shot, like it's happening with Stevenson. And secondly Hopkins is old, you can say what every you want but you can't credit very high win against 49 (!!!) year old Hopkins.

From that perspective Ward vs Kovalev looks interesting as well as GGG vs Ward. But it is highly questionable if Ward wants any of those two fights.

 

Kovalev has a slightly better resume, but what does it have to do with who is better ??? Resumes don't fight in the ring.

Golovkin's skill set is better than Kovalev's.

 

Golovkin had a shot to shut the haters up and go up to 168 to beat Ward. He chose money instead, just like nearly every other fighter in existence.

Saying he is overrated is not hate, it's truth.