I like Katsidis, the man comes to fight and gives you everything he's got, but going up against Pacquiao is pretty much the equivalent of what would happen when you put a chihuahua against a bear.
i think he is right. although most people on here think it would be a waste of time i think after the phillipino's saw katsidis fight amonsat, i think that would be enough to entice them to go and watch this fight. it wouldn't matter if they thought manny would win by ko in the 1st rd, they'd still go.
katsidis has heart and comes to fight, but i'm never that excited by him...i rather see him in against valero, and then we can start talking manny.
i wouldn't mind if pac accepts a tune-up or an exhibition fight in the philippines against katsidis. they could held it an open field park and it could easilly get more than a million live spectators. about several years ago, when pac fought yeshmagambetov in luneta park, it was already packed with more than 100 thousand people and pac then was not yet as big as he is now.
Katsidis takes to many punches to be able to beat Paquiao. He's kind of like a Aururo Gatti like fighter.
Katsidis is one delusional mother****er. Biggest fight in history? Manny will never fight Katsidis. Its a waste of time for him. Besides that, Kat would have to sign waivers for fighting Pacquiao... cause the chances of him dying would be very high.
Why not . . . Katsidis can be a very good stay busy fight for Pacquiao. Rather than fighting unknown opponents with 0-5-0 record. If all big fights fizzles out . . . then go for it.
katsidis should fight valero. i think the guy will provide the competition in which to gauge valero potential. not some darn 40 year old fighter names pituala.