Katsidis versus Nate Campbell

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by boxer92, Jul 21, 2007.



  1. Motor City Sam

    Motor City Sam Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,102
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    From what I have seen of both fighters, I agree. Unless, of course, age catches up with Nate.
     
  2. ipswich express

    ipswich express Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,487
    1,161
    Aug 22, 2004
    Sorry, now you're sounding really bitter. None of the Australian papers I have say that the "ref was horrible". Nate got schooled that night. Mentally he looked beat before he stepped in the ring.
     
  3. PIRA

    PIRA Arise Sir Lennox. Full Member

    5,426
    881
    Mar 30, 2007
    And of course as his promoter you would not have blinders on?
    Your comments are crap - there was zero controversy because your man was outclassed - after talking up a storm about how Peden did not deserve to beat him Robbie proved he was the better man fair and square for the second time.

    Put the bout up and let ereryone judge for themselves.
     
  4. HandsOfGold

    HandsOfGold Member Full Member

    477
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Nate thumps Katsidis.
     
  5. PIRA

    PIRA Arise Sir Lennox. Full Member

    5,426
    881
    Mar 30, 2007
    I lean towards Kat. At age 35 Campbell does not have much more to give at this weight and I cannot see him being able to match kat's workrate and being frustrated accordingly. Add to that his mental weakness and Kat breaks him down ala Bomber but in more brutal fashion. Kat KO6.
     
  6. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    hahaha.... I love the part about the DNA testing. What a joke. Some people talk some absolute rubbish on here.