Keith Thurman beat Shawn Porter without holding the whole time

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Beatle, Jun 26, 2016.


  1. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    Since Keith Thurman beat Shawn Porter without relying on illegal tactics, we can say that his win is much better than Kell Brook's "win" (I scored it for Porter).

    Kell Brook is a Euro-fraud until he legitimately beats an A-level fighter. Keith Thurman is the main man at welterweight and I expect him to easily beat Brook.

    Facts make life more simple, folks :deal
     
  2. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,963
    514
    Oct 15, 2007
    best way to know would be to make brook vs thurman
     
  3. Boxing fan 75

    Boxing fan 75 Active Member Full Member

    564
    9
    May 26, 2016
    So does ignorance. Congrats on the simple life.
     
  4. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Thurman's the real deal I doubted it slightly after the Collazo fight but now that he showed ***** and went toe to toe and fought a WAR with Porter he proved everything.
     
  5. SOUTHERMOST

    SOUTHERMOST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    216
    Oct 24, 2006
    Most of the holding was done by Keith he lost the battle in the ropes Porter was mauling him.
     
  6. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    Thurman held a bit but not the whole fight like Brook did. That's why Thurman's win is legit, whereas Brook won via the sympathetic ref who didn't take points away.
     
  7. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    I love how you hide that you're from the UK. I'll see you after Thurman exposes that hypejob you guys adore.
     
  8. Loggo

    Loggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,029
    2
    Mar 26, 2006
    The only hypejob is Porter.
     
  9. EverLastingEdge

    EverLastingEdge The Eternal One banned Full Member

    107
    2
    Jun 26, 2016
    The only reason Thurman won is bcause he sucks Al haymons ****.
     
  10. EverLastingEdge

    EverLastingEdge The Eternal One banned Full Member

    107
    2
    Jun 26, 2016
    He proved that he is a little ***** that is willing to hug and hold to avoid a full out war.
     
  11. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,619
    493
    Jul 9, 2012
    kell brook is a fraud who fights bums

    all he did was hold porter......one of the judges even had the fight 114-114

    brook was lucky that porter had t-rex arms
     
  12. Ukansodoff

    Ukansodoff Deontay plz stop ducking Joshua. Thank you. Full Member

    10,980
    6,712
    Aug 7, 2010
    Strange thread. Brook is just a eurobum until he proves otherwise like Thurman just proved by beating Porter. Haha. Gotta love this forum.

    Some ppl gave the fight to Porter over Thurman, not me but it was a very close fight. Only idiots didn't give Brook the win when he beat Porter a bit more convincingly.
     
  13. ki_ote

    ki_ote Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    18
    Jan 10, 2007
    Just the opposite.
    Basically he proved lack of skills by having to go to war with Porter.
    Brook wins against Thurman.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G928A using Tapatalk
     
  14. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM Full Member

    47,857
    27,809
    Oct 23, 2011
    Porter made it VERY hard for clinching to happen.

    He was never in the 1 step forward clinch initiation range

    and when he was on the ropes he made sure Thurman couldn't grab him.
     
  15. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Wish the match with Brook could be made so Keith could KHTFO... but Vargas is gonna tap that azz first unfortunately