Spence is the truth but the truth is relative. He's going to be chasing shadows all night against Thurman. The frustration of swiping at thin will manifest itself very quickly and it won't take long for him to become ragged and wild. And when he does Thurman will put the brakes on and stop on a dime and punish him for his mistakes and he'll jump right back on his bicycle before Spence even knows what he's just been hit with. Spence's gas tanks will be as dry as bone in the desert sun come round 8 and he'll be a sitting duck for Thurman's heavy artillery. Thurman via highlight reel KO10. Take it to the bank.
Spence can cut the ring off and he will do so against thurman. When he does thurman will be on borrowed time.
I think Thurman would beat him, he has better movement and more punching power. I rate Thurman above Kell Brook and Errol Spence. Keith Thurman is the more complete fighter in my opinion and i'm being objective, i really like both of them.
I felt if no injur and weight issues at 147 only brook can beat spencer thurman doesn't have the technical and southpaw skills like brook has it's just styles.
MD for Spence. If Thurman isn't throwing punches I don't feel he's as effective as when Spence isn't throwing.. I see Thurman on the outside and Spence continuing to corner him. Spence has a tighter shell and more balanced disposition in the ring.
brook probably cant even look up today, cause his neck is so sore from getting his head whipped around by those jabs.
He was but he didn't seem to be committed to setting down on his punches, the question I had about this fight has been answered. Golovkin took out a piece of Kell.
This. And i hope he stays for a while. The division is stacked with big time names and others are moving up to 147.
Thurman''s power is extremely overrated but he does have excellent hand & foot speed. Unfortunately he doesn't take bodyshots very well which will ultimately be the deciding factor vs Spence.