Keith Thurman's stock skyrocketed on May 3rd

In that case so did Pacquiao's:

Pacquiao > Rios /Alvarado > Prescott > Khan > Diaz/Porter > Alexander > Maidana/ Mayweather

 

Thurman need to beat Porter, Maidan and Mathysse for his stock to catapult.

Thurman would Demolish Alexander.

 

Keith Thurman always was #1 Welterweight on my list, its unfair to compare a young natural 147 puncher vs the 130-GOAT..Thurman gets minor credit for beating Floyd not impressive... cause Floyd is closer to 40 and fight night weighs in 148 vs youngsters coming in near 160...Big Credit to Floyd, little to his opponents

Thurman route to greatness is to be the first 4 title Era, Undisputed Welterweight Champion, then work on breaking Tito & Armstrong consecutive title defenses...He will be an ATG & unintentionally very wealthy :hellohi

 

If you knew anything about boxing, you'd realise traingle theories never work

Ali>Foreman>Frazier
Margarito>Cotto>Mosely
Pavlik>Taylor>Hopkins

and the list goes on

Mayweather is greater than all of those fighters mentioned, not only that...he has a 100% win record against them :hi:

 

He's still unpolished.

 

I agree, he is #1 Welterweight at 70% of his potential :smoke

 

Thurman gets hit too much to be the next big thing imo
Just because he beat diaz doesn't mean that much it's not as good as beating diaz when porter and to a lesser extent khan did.
You know this was Diaz's last fight he just took the money and retired imo.

 

Marquez > Pacquiao > Bradley is an example of how triangle theories don't work.

Marquez in my opinion won the 3rd and 4th Pacquiao fights yet Bradley won their fight, Pacquiao beat Bradley twice in my opinion.

You could go Ricky burns > Kevin Mitchell > Prescott > Khan > Kotelnik > Maidana.

 

No newbie...Khan got floored by Diaz and Porter went 1-0-1 on paper with Diaz...many felt Diaz won...so thanks for emphasizing Thurman superiority overall current Welterweights :deal