Kell Brook has a better chance to beat Golovkin than Canelo

Ask Robert Guerrero, he says Thurman's jab is harder than Danny's power shots. Yeah Danny with his paltry 56% KO ratio isn't quite as impressive as Kell with his 69% KO ratio. KOing Khan and a half dead EriK Morales doesn't impress me much.

 

Newsflash: Canelo would too.:deal

 

Nonito Smoak sounding like a smarmy know it all douche again....


Hmmmm. Interesting.


Listen you crackpot, Danny Garcia has KO wins over a shot to hell decrepit versions of Erik Morales and Malignaggi and glass jawed Amir Khan, that's it.

Brook has KO wins over Dan, Bizier, Senchenko and Gavin, to date their only legit KO losses, none of these guys have weak chins or were half dead shells of themselves. He clearly hurt Porter several times, way worse than Thurman did, and Brook's performance against Porter was pretty clear cut, Thurman it could be argued lost to Porter. Hatton said he hits harder than Canelo, and its pretty obvious he's telling the truth if you watch Hatton against both of them.

The only thing that's Hmmm Interesting here is you somehow trying to act like Garcia is on Brook's level powerwise or skillwise, to drive your not so subtle agenda. I've been a Brook hyper for a while, this has nothing to do with GGG.

Garcia is average in every way, that much should be clear to most people by now.

 

Yeah because losing to Mauricio Herrera and struggling to beat old worn out versions Guerrero, Holt and Peterson and the thoroughly mediocre Theophane is the sign of an ATG. The only drama queen here is you.

 

You highly doubt that Canelo who was stunned by a jab from Khan, a glancing blow from Kirkland (he hid it well) and a left hook from Cotto's bro would last 6 rounds with one of the hardest punchers in the sport, come on, you know better than that. GGG walks him down and stops him with malice in 3 to 4 rounds.