"Kell Brook is the Best Welterweight."

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pac a G, Mar 22, 2016.


  1. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    Skill wise only spence and Maybe Thurman stand a chance against him.



    people like to bash Brooks resume but honestly what's spence, Thurman, Garcia, and khans standout wins at 147 ?
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006
    Not based on his résumé, no, but h2h, arguably yes.
     
  3. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Thurman is the most proven welterweight right now followed by Brook. The division is weak right now until some fights between the top 10 go down because too many of them are undefeated or just 1 loss which means they aren't fighting the top guys.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006
    :good
     
  5. KnightAndDay

    KnightAndDay Active Member Full Member

    616
    49
    Mar 5, 2016
    He's top 5 WW, easily. Probably top 3 and, yes, an argument can be made that he's #1.
     
  6. kobashi

    kobashi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,533
    811
    Jan 2, 2010
    why doest cotto take the brook fight?

    HBO want that fight.
     
  7. turnip

    turnip Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,115
    39
    Oct 19, 2015
    Sad but true .let's see Brook v Garcia. Brook gives it the Barrys about fighting the best well come on then!.
     
  8. The Nightfly

    The Nightfly Tonight the night is mine Full Member

    454
    38
    Mar 2, 2016
    Brook needs a unification big time after this!
    the ibf rankings are awful!
     
  9. MrMagoo1986

    MrMagoo1986 Active Member Full Member

    1,128
    0
    Sep 7, 2009
    Think you'll find Bradley is far more proven than either Thurman or Brook
     
  10. MrMagoo1986

    MrMagoo1986 Active Member Full Member

    1,128
    0
    Sep 7, 2009
    Thurman's resume is just as much of a joke..... Difference between Khan and Garcia though is that Thurman and Brook have been at the weight for 8+ years, Garcia and Khan have moved up only in recent years and have a much better record of names between them through their careers
     
  11. IKSAB

    IKSAB Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,411
    1,180
    Nov 29, 2014
    Pacquiao (obviously), Bradley, Brook, Porter are all more proven then Thurman
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    brook makes the top five, but not top three.
     
  13. ki_ote

    ki_ote Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    18
    Jan 10, 2007
    Froch is probably tougher than he is smart.
     
  14. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    At Welterweight, Bradley holds wins over 2 blown up light welterweights who went back to LWW, a split decision with Pacquiao that many believe he lost which he ended up losing the rematch, and Brandon Rios who has done terrible at Welterweight with one of his wins coming from DQ which he was losing. Vargas also stunned him with one punch sooo....

    I like Bradley but he isn't the best Welterweight. Like I said the division is weak until they start fighting each other.
     
  15. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Pacquiao is very beatable right now. I explained why Bradley isn't, Brook and Porter haven't fought any good Welterweights. Not like Thurman is leagues ahead of them. Thurman can be beat but I wouldn't put any of them as favorites against him.