A decent resume is compiled of solid fights vs solid top 50 guys in or about your weight class. A good resume is compiled of good fights vs solid top 30s in or around your division. A great resume is compiled of great fights vs A,B level fighters in the top 20 in or around your, when you fight them. An elite resume is compiled of mega-fights vs A level fighters(top 5's, titlists, and elite fighters in your DIVISION when you fight them. Wilder has 4 total fights inside the top 50. Audley Harrison(top 50), Sergey Liakovich(top 50), Malik Scott(top 30) and Berman Stiverne(top 10/titlist). Brook has 12 fights vs guys in the top 50, including 9 inside the top 30, 4 of them inside the top 20, and 3 of those 4 in the top 20, while his lone A level, top 5, titlist win was over Porter. The win over Porter, while LESS dominant than Wilder's win over Stiverne is better than all 4 of Wilders top 50 wins. That said, Brooks wins over Dan, Gavin, Hatton, JonesX2, and Senchenko are more than enough to put him over Wilder outside of a win over Potvetkin, Klitschko, Fury or Pulev. :think
Brook has a great resume IMO. Not elite by any means, but great considering the quantity and quality of his top 10 wins. Wilder has what I would consider a decent, bordering on on good resume should he be successful vs Molina then Szpilka. A win over both Molina and Szpilka put him cleanly into the good resume category. I don't see how he could beat Potvetkin this yr, so if he's unable to get another exception, he'll likely lose and get a NC when Potvetkin is caught by VADA. That said, an L, even reruled a NC is still an L resume-wise. And that would keep him in the decent resume category.:think
Shockingly good at sending at sending taxi drivers and pizza delivery boys to work with a black eye the next morning.
u srs? Outside of Stiverne, Wilder has only faced bums. And the level of opposition is HW is very very poor so even that W is nothing special really. Kell has build up a resume with some solid names and beat them.