I'm fairly certain Brook will step up his opposition soon & it's unlikely he will be KO'd unless it's Thurman or Maidana Wilder on the otherhand...
They're about equal but I'd rate Brook higher... Don't mean to be a British hating troll but it is what it is [emoji38]
100%. Brook was protected for a long time, but at least seems to be trying to make some big fights lately.
Porter was the IBF champ? is there that much of a difference?... WW is a much stronger division than HW... Also didn't stiverne have severe dehydration? It's obvious something was fishy about Stivernes performance that night... Anyone who says that Wilder > Brook must be in bed with Haymon...
Look at your username... :rofl Like I said if you rate Brook worse than Wilder, YOU HAVE AN AGENDA. Your agenda is probably to promote that hypejob Amir KHAN. Seeing as his name is in your username... Lol not even trying to hide it.
Everyone with any sense or knowledge of boxing knows that Brook has the more impressive resume. That does not mean the future will go well. I am just stating the absolute obvious. I also have no faith in WIlder, mind
Hard to say, both guys fought a pretty good name to earn the belt, but neither have fought better opp since then. I would go with Deontay though...
Stiverne's not a good name The guy was a cherrypick gone wrong for the WBC when they tried to make tits Arreola a champ after Vitali vacated his belt Porter is a better win than Stiverne, Porter actually beat a legit beltholder
Wilder and it's not close. At least Brook has fought several decent fighters. Wilder? The only live body he's got on his ledger is the limited Bermane Stiverne, which says it all