Kell Brook stuck between a rock (Spence) and a hard place (154 top 10)

Who the **** is David Alcine? See like I said YDKSAB.

 

Okay I'm actually going to attempt to respond to this mess.

The first point, he just fought GGG, I doubt he's going back to fighting Jo Jo Dan's, since his stock rose far more in losing than many fighters do in winning, he can actually push for big matches now, and has it sunken into your thick skull that he just fought GENNADY GOLOVKIN you know one of the most feared fighters in the sport. That kind of means any argument that you attempt to make painting Brook as a coward is complete and utter bull****.

Cotto a former Welter has done just fine at JMW, and he's a midget, Brook is a huge solid JMW who can take the punches of a MW destroyer without touching the canvass, oh those featherfisted JMW's are so scary, please. The Charlo's are trash, he KO's both of them, if Vanes can drop Andrade, Brook can drop Andrade, Lara may be tricky, Trout might be as well, but he could close SD both of them in the UK. I've said for years Brook was all wrong for and could beat Canelo, after all according to Hatton, he hits harder, and I'm sticking by that. J-Rock would possibly be a handful, but I think he beats most of JMW so that's not an insult to Brook.

What the hell has Spence done to prove he's a level above Brook? He just KO'd Bundu, whose best win was Frankie Gavin, and that was damn close, and Brook stopped Gavin. So what. Also I might add Bundu was Spence's "step up" and for most including you I'm sure Gavin was considered a "step down".

Algieri may be better than Dan and Gavin, that being said Shawn Porter knocks his brains out of his skull, I can say without hesitation Brook, Porter and Thurman all stop Algieri and I was one of the few pre-Provo Chris fans on here. His style was all wrong for Khan, and Spence's style was all wrong for Chris.

Spence can't deal with movers with speed, he's wide open for counters, lucky for him most of his opponents have had 20% KO ratios. Spence won't have his typical size advantage against Brook, and if Van Heerden can last 8 rounds, trust me a guy who stood up to GGG's power can last 8 rounds with Spence, only the question is can the guy who was almost dropped by Lartey (and had to survive the last round) stand up to Brook's assault or 8 rounds?


So I see you've revealed yourself to be a full on Khangoon that I accused you of the other day, I'm happy to see you fully come out of that embarrassing closet, it must really suck to have hitched your wagon to a guy would beat guys comprehensively if he could only just stop getting KTFO. But he can't can he? Brook is every bit as fast as Khan, his timing is better, his angles are better, his footwork is better, he does everything better. Khan flurries Brook KO's him cold with an immaculately timed counter straight right in 2, just like Bizier, who has a better chin than Khan.

So you think GGG is over rated and think CEJ beats him, but you're crediting him with single handedly ruining Geale's career, hmmm. Geale was Aussie level, the only reason he made it to GGG is because Barker and Sturm aren't monster KO artists, and he didn't beat one of them, and the Sturm decision was close as usual, Brook has proven he can hang at world level just fine, pre and like Murray most likely post GGG.