Kell Brook thread

Who are the good names on Khan's list of victories at 147?

 

Gavin was 8 weeks after his mandatory. Gavin was just a quick way of getting a load of easy cash.

 

good to see someone who appreciates an excellent boxer as well...you dont have to have fought every p4p boxer out there to see there is a top class boxer in Brook ,i think the casual fan gets carried away with razzamatazz and Boxrec stats...imo the WW division is going downhill fast almost falling apart, and i agree that Brook COULD take over for the foreseeable future...the way it is going i could see a showdown with Thurman probably 2017 to see who is the top dog?

Also to the Brook hater...Gavin was more or less the mandatory anyway as hre was going to fight Bradley for a shot at Brook but Bradley wanted no part of it...wonder why?

 

amir khan has only been in the ww division for 1 year and already has 3 wins over algeiri, alexander and collazo.

those 3 are better than everybody on brook's resume minus shawn porter easily....

brook's been there all his life (over 10 years) and has one of the worst resumes in history for a champion.....he added two more tomato cans to his record this year in what is probably the most packed division in boxing...he has only that one win over porter, that's it.

finally, this thread is about brook not khan.......all these brook fans are always quick to bring khan in as if he is the end all be all

 

I don't come on here often but I remember your user name and all you do is bang on about Khan and Brook.

Get a life!

Khan has never beaten a top 10 Welterweight and is the most unlikeable/ arrogant/ deluded/ annoying person in boxing.

 

He's a top fighter, been a fan of his a long time. Dunno about ATG but he'll be hard for anyone to beat at WW at the moment. You'd have to say his resume isn't the best so far, that's just being honest, but I think that'll change over the next 2 years.

 

good, dont need more fools boasting about brook's resume filled with bums

 

I'd like to see him in with maidana, Garcia, thurman, Bradley, at least one of those by the end of the year if he wants to get a shot against floyd or manny then he needs to back it up.

 

I'm a massive fan, he's the most impressive fighter I've ever seen live. I first saw him in the flesh when he KO'd a local boy in his first British title defence many years ago and I called him as a future star right then. He has all the tools to be a top p4p fighter but Eddie needs to deliver him the big boys in the next 12-18 months and then hopefully a move up 154 and the same again. He needs the massive fights now and he's ready for them.

 

he does want them fights...i seen an interview with him and he said he wants all them fights where people think he has no chance and will lose like the Porter fight..people go on about the boxers he has beaten not being very good but they need to watch the manner in what he has beat these fighters...he shows brilliantly that he can adapt to all styles and really just demolishes them..he can only beat who is put in front of him and he does that very well imo

Mayweather and Pac will be gone soon enough and i dont see too many others being able to beat Brook

*oh and i agree 154 is where he will finally end up...

 

Boxers on Brook's resume who would beat Khan or cause hom major problems are Matthew Hatton, Carson Jones, Porter, Senchenko, N'dou, Jackiewitz and maybe FRankie Gavin.

Khan's 3 opponents are all fairly awful and Brook could beat them at the same time.

If Khan fights Brook then he could genuinely be decapitated.

 

lol at frankie gavin could maybe beat amir khan......and the brook fans have nerve to criticize khan's opponents? WOW

fairly awful atsch

yea brook's are p4p in the top 10.....fk outta here

i appreciate the fans who posted above you and said that he needs to step it up...it's clear as day

 

stop turning every this thread into the same boring Khan is better than Brook thread like you always do....there are millions of them already and you just keep saying the same stuff over and over

people are beginning to appreciate Brook more these days and im glad he is finally getting some recognition ,the boxing aficionado has always admired Brook as an overall boxer

 

I'm not a Brook fan, I do not have to support Brook because I dislike Khan. I'm an adult

You have made it clear you are a Khan fan so anything you say about Brook or Khan is bias in my opinion, I've read your posts.

Ok, this Porter argument is getting tired but let's look at it, over the last 3 years Khan has not beaten a better opponent than Porter.

Khan's best win in 3 years is Alexander and Porter had already beaten him.

End of conversation really :good

 

:rofl

owned