Kell Brook vs Diego Chaves?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Oneirokritis, Dec 22, 2015.


  1. BEATDOWNZ

    BEATDOWNZ Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,382
    1,045
    Nov 30, 2014
    Brook isn't even fighting top 10 guys. Way more out there than Khan.
     
  2. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,258
    18,350
    Feb 4, 2012
    You consider Bizier B-level? I wouldn't.
     
  3. Oneirokritis

    Oneirokritis The Scourge of Stupid Idiots. Full Member

    7,333
    6,019
    Dec 18, 2015
    I couldn't agree more. Brook appears to be holding onto the hope of landing the Khan fight, and single-mindedly chasing it to the detriment of trying to make fights with guys like Shawn Porter again, Keith Thurman, Timmy Bradley, Danny Garcia, and Errol Spence. He certainly should be doing more with his career and title reign than defending his title against the likes of Dan, Gavin and Bizier.
     
  4. zulander

    zulander Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,037
    1,721
    Mar 17, 2006
    A touch cryptic. Do u think he's better than b level. Or r u saying he's a much worse? His best win is a shot to sin nate Campbell.
     
  5. BEATDOWNZ

    BEATDOWNZ Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,382
    1,045
    Nov 30, 2014
    Agreed. Eddie and Kell won't go near a top 10 guy until they face Khan.
     
  6. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,258
    18,350
    Feb 4, 2012
    Wording wise I can understand why that came across as unclear but considering the context of who we're discussing I'd see my feelings were obvious.

    Bizier is waaaay worse than B-level IMO. Beaten twice by a C- (at best) level fighter in Dan and as you say without any really notable wins.

    He's without a doubt one of the worst mandatory challengers in recent times. Who did he beat to get this shot? A french journeyman and the equally untested and padded Lawson. Please.
     
  7. DeathEater

    DeathEater Active Member Full Member

    947
    2
    Dec 27, 2012
    I get it, you didn't get a chance to fiddle your 6 month child tonight no wonder you're angry. Oh well, typical council estate chavs life for you eh.

    I get, I honestly do. You hate those superior to you but face facts, you're one of life's dirty vile bigots who are a cancer to humanity. Please don't breed any more rats
     
  8. TERRYTIBBS

    TERRYTIBBS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,252
    8
    Jun 11, 2013

    Don't worry about him bro, he's still butthurt at everyone laughing at him after I exsposed him haha.

    He's prob sitting on his mum's sofa drinking super tenants, getting ignored by the women he is texting off his cheap Nokia phone.
     
  9. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,258
    18,350
    Feb 4, 2012
    You guys seriously need to get a grip. He is a *****, of that there is no doubt but what do you think you come across as when you start talking about 6 month old babies being "fiddled" with?

    That's a disgusting comment to make and you should be ashamed of yourself to bring that into whateve argument you're having with that idiot today.
     
  10. DeathEater

    DeathEater Active Member Full Member

    947
    2
    Dec 27, 2012
    Oh is that Solaris's alt?

    😂😂😂

    This guy is such a loser, will put the vile creature on block
     
  11. supremo

    supremo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,765
    14
    Oct 15, 2009
    Aye but calling someone a "dirty rag head" is perfectly acceptable...
    This forum is full of clowns.
     
  12. Decy

    Decy Barely Coherent Full Member

    3,893
    185
    Oct 23, 2006
    I think the point is neither are acceptable.
     
  13. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,258
    18,350
    Feb 4, 2012
    I'm glad someone gets the point. Neither are acceptable. I'd ban both of them for their comments which I find disgusting.