Kell Brook vs. Tommy Hearns at WW

what does the conclusion tell ya ?

 

But how do you beat someone that has never lost?

 

huh Brook is not even on Ray's level .. Hearn is more athletic then Ray, Ray was able to tricked Hearns into being too over confident and Hearns got carless and left an opening for Ray to capitalize on .. Ray had to patient to see the plan through, but still he was inches away from loosing to Hearns ..

Nothing that Iv seen of brook, show me that he can rely on more then just his Athletic ability to win fights .. Against a young Hearn with no millage with plenty of speed he would need it.

 

he has not lost in this era, I don't think that would be the case in the 80s .. You had so much talent Hearns, Ray , and Curry which I doubt he could beat any of them..

 

He would steamroll them all faster than he did to the next Trinidad 2 fights ago.

 

This content is protected

 

So you're saying that Brook could beat Hearns, Ray and Curry ? Do tell funny man.

 

I think he's saying now's not the time for SERIOUS analysis...Obvious TROLL thread:nut