Kell Brook was the Bigger Fighter in the Ring...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by There Will Be Blood, Sep 10, 2016.


  1. There Will Be Blood

    There Will Be Blood #TheMedicalTeam #750 banned Full Member

    3,848
    1,778
    Sep 6, 2016
    Kell was faster, physically stronger, AND he was punching HARD. I bet Kell was near the 180 mark.
     
    There Will Be Blood, Sep 10, 2016
    There Will Be Blood, Sep 10, 2016
    #1
  2. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    No GG dwarfed Kellz

    It was obvious Kellz didn't belong at middleweight but still whooped that boy in a few rounds
     
    Kush, Sep 10, 2016
    Kush, Sep 10, 2016
    #2
  3. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,003
    1,859
    Oct 13, 2008
    Did they do fight night weights?
     
    NewBoxingOrder, Sep 10, 2016
    NewBoxingOrder, Sep 10, 2016
    #3
  4. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Kell wasn't bigger.. your crazy bro.
     
    Gander Tasco, Sep 10, 2016
    Gander Tasco, Sep 10, 2016
    #4
  5. Hercegovac

    Hercegovac Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,583
    98
    Oct 19, 2010
    Kell rehydrated a few pounds more than GGG, so at least weight wise, he was the bigger man.

    Doesn't really mean much though, because Kell had zero experience fighting guys that are MWs.
     
    Hercegovac, Sep 10, 2016
    Hercegovac, Sep 10, 2016
    #5
  6. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,043
    Oct 13, 2010
    Agree

    Yet post fight the moron Sky Sports pundits were constantly saying GGG was too big
     
    Beouche, Sep 10, 2016
    Beouche, Sep 10, 2016
    #6
  7. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    All you had to do was look at the two and you saw who was bigger. GG by a country mile.
     
    BlizzyBlizz, Sep 10, 2016
    BlizzyBlizz, Sep 10, 2016
    #7
  8. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    He wasn't even close to 180, he wasn't cutting much weight. Probably 164-168.
     
    alexthegreatmc, Sep 10, 2016
    alexthegreatmc, Sep 10, 2016
    #8
  9. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,619
    493
    Jul 9, 2012
    kell was the bigga man, even weighed in heavier, brook got no excuses, he just a fraud....fought cab drivers all his life
     
    critix, Sep 10, 2016
    critix, Sep 10, 2016
    #9
  10. samohtdivad

    samohtdivad New Member Full Member

    53
    4
    Jan 28, 2013
    Do you people not realise when someone is trolling?
    Respect to Brook, he landed a some good shots and didnt go down despite taking some from the modern day 'hand of stones' But he was not the bigger fighter.
     
    samohtdivad, Sep 10, 2016
    samohtdivad, Sep 10, 2016
    #10
  11. GoldenArms

    GoldenArms Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,326
    242
    Jan 24, 2009
    Im gonna have to see the replay again because to me it looked they were about the same. GGG was definitely the stronger fighter though, Kell couldn't clinch him up like he did Porter
     
    GoldenArms, Sep 10, 2016
    GoldenArms, Sep 10, 2016
    #11