Kell Brook would NEVER fight his IBF mandatory Errol Spence

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by critix, Apr 16, 2016.


  1. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,867
    Apr 19, 2010
    Who you got as top five as I have brook and porter:think
     
  2. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,867
    Apr 19, 2010
    What about his right leg
     
  3. TheDarkLord

    TheDarkLord Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,854
    15
    May 24, 2011
    I nearly typed that.....then remembered :D
     
  4. jamescomeback

    jamescomeback Active Member Full Member

    1,347
    1
    Dec 5, 2015
    yeah he needs to fight spence
     
  5. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    i agree but i think spence would beat him
     
  6. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,867
    Apr 19, 2010
    So kell is right fighting his mandatories which in turn as laid the path quicker for him and Spence to meet :lol::blurp
     
  7. jamescomeback

    jamescomeback Active Member Full Member

    1,347
    1
    Dec 5, 2015
    Probably would have been better to try and force bigger fights imo but now he has fought these poor mandatories if he decides to vacate now it'l look horrible
     
  8. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,867
    Apr 19, 2010
    But kell does face his mandatories when as he never:think
    UN like others eh
    Why would he drtop his only bargaining tool:lol:
     
  9. kobashi

    kobashi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,533
    811
    Jan 2, 2010
    Why would he need to vacate. He has 12 months before he needs to fight his next mandatory.

    Some of you are going on like brook has to fight him next or he will lose the belt.
     
  10. jamescomeback

    jamescomeback Active Member Full Member

    1,347
    1
    Dec 5, 2015
    Ok didnt realise that he'll have at least 2 fights by then
     
  11. beast boxer

    beast boxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,512
    7
    Jul 2, 2013
    Brook would bulldoze Spence and it should be in Britain because it will be bigger and make more money.
     
  12. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,311
    131,665
    Jul 21, 2009
    That's a great match up. Both of them are big for the weight, skilled and can punch. Spence hasn't fought anyone who hits hard enough to curtail his aggression yet. Up until now he's been able to walk his opponents down because he doesn't have to worry too much about what's coming back at him. That won't be the case against Brook who hits much harder than anyone he's fought. That said, I'm not totally sold on Brook's durability and I think Spence will be able to take him out if he's able to stand up to his power and we still don't know how sturdy Spence's whiskers are yet.
     
  13. carebear

    carebear Member Full Member

    461
    47
    Nov 30, 2013
    1. Floyd
    2. Manny
    3. Garcia
    4. Spence
    5. Thurman
    6. Bradley
    7. Khan
    8. Porter (rematch)
    9. Crawford
    10. Postol

    Who would Brook beat from that list? At 147.
     
  14. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,867
    Apr 19, 2010
    You said five
    And your top two are now retired you will have to post a new top five and I'm pretty sure postal is 140 and so is crawford so you will have to try again
     
  15. On_The_Ropes

    On_The_Ropes Active Member Full Member

    946
    254
    Jan 3, 2016
    I don't think AL Haymon will take Spence down the IBF route, he will more likely go for one of the weaker champions first. None of the top WW want any part in Brook, he is an avoided fighter for a good reason.