Kell Brook would NEVER fight his IBF mandatory Errol Spence

-insert kovalev clucking noise-

what you gonna do special one? what u gonna do?

 

Thankfully Hearn and haymon have a good working relationship. No way Brook ducks anyone

 

It be a great fight after spence gets two more quality fights in

 

I'm starting to lean to that way of thinking too.

 

I think that Spence should tighten up his game a little more before challenging for Brooks title. I would like to see him fight a banger and speedster with pop first. I believe that he has the skills but not the temperament to adjust if he needs to. I want him to be ready to beat Brooks ass with confidence. Brook is no cakewalk.

 

Spence isn't even the mandatory challenger yet. You cant become mandatory IBF challenger without having a final elimination fight.

 

Nah, Brook won't take this fight, period.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G928A using Tapatalk

 

nah I dont think so. when Spence becomes mandatory the fight will be in the UK and Kell gets 75% of the money. Add in PPV revenue also from sky box office. Its a no brainer!

will be a big fight for kell and he makes good money from it. no chance they will turn that fight down.

 

He beat Shawn Porter the guy many Americans hyped up as mini mike Tyson before Brook beat him. His two mandatories weren't big fights but they were mandatories, what can you do.

The point many people forget to realise is that none of the top fighters have shown an appetite to fight Brook yet, no one is calling him out as they see him as too much of a risk.

 

Brooks will somehow get injure again ,end of story.

 

Ahhhhh... i know who this is.... Green pants.