Kell Brookz vs Danny Garcia

I'd like to see it. Brook still has a lot to prove before saying a win against a fighter like Garcia is a foregone conclusion. I think Brook might be happy to be a stay-at-home Joe and milk his title for all it's worth. I'm not sure he wants the big names.

 

What was the ban bet?

And if I have an alt then what is? People alt's are normally easy to identify (e.g. I can id the boxing_master, ellerbe, attaboi, blizzy within 5 posts so) so either I have a very clever way of hiding mine or maybe, just maybe I don't have one

I can remember you saying Brook was a bum, I don't remember the ban bet. What is the bet you are challenging me to? But whatever it is I still want you around here when you lose it. And I won't let you forget it.

 

Check the end of the post you quoted http://www.boxingforum24.com/showpost.php?p=17540332

 

Name the top class fighter at welter who's management will just let them step in the ring with Brook, even in their own back garden.

Since Brook's been champion fights have been offered to Mayweather, Pacquiao, Khan, Marquez, Maidana, Rios, Provodnikov, Bradley. It was them that said no, not Brook.

Also Bundu, Khan, Bradley, Porter, Ali and Alexander all rejected the chance to fight in a final eliminator for Brook's title.


So where are you getting Brook doesn't want the big fights from? Seems to me like the big name fighters don't want to fight him..

 

I let a fighter's record speak for itself. Not what Eddie Hearn tells 'Kugs' on IFL.

 

Ah, I didn't read his all of his drivel

But I very much doubt Keith 'I will fight anyone, you know who to call his name his Al Haymon then he can duck any fighter outside of his own stable who has a chance to beat me for me' Thurman (who's currently stalling on fighting Brook's son Porter) will fight Brook.

But should that fight happen, I'd want his first desbian experience here to rub it in his grubby face and once again throw his lack of boxing knowledge in his face. Plus if the ban bets of Brook v Porter proved anything, it's people who get beat don't honor their ban bets and alt up.

 

Well name the big name fighter that would be willing to jump into the ring with Brook. Remember Brook is the only top welterweight who is not with Haymon or Arum and do you think they want to risk their superstars v Brook. I don't.

Saying Brook isn't willing to fight the top fighters is like saying Golovkin doesn't want to fight Cotto because it hasn't happened yet.

And it's not just want Hearn told Kugs. Those guys rejected final eliminators. That is fact.

 

Typical.

Carry on in your land of rainbows and unicorns Hans.

 

Show me where I said Brook was a bum. You can't because I didn't.

My stance on Brook has been consistent. I think he is good and talented, but has been very protected and faced unnecessarily soft competition for ages. He's had 1 world class fight in 35 fights at 30 years old. So, yes, he has something yet to prove. Guys like you look at the shiny record, lap it up like mother's milk, and are ready to annoint him as an atg and unbeatable. Again, typical.