Not a particularly brilliant insight by kellerman. For a start GGG won decisively. . The scorecards were way off. Not knocking Jacobs, I've been saying for years he is the best us middle in a long time.Jacobs was very impressive, GGG s best opponent...movement, skills, chin guts and lets not forget a major size advantage too. But t Golovkin beat him decisively and clearly folks. Brilliant victory for golovkin.
Dude both of those videos were classic Max Kellerman double speak. He will say that Floyd has no obligation to fight Triple G, then say that the only way he makes another $100 million in boxing is by fighting Triple G. But he never throws Floyd's age around as being too old ever. Now he is the HBO AARP consultant for Golovkin and 35 is old. It is but that was never a problem until Saturday night.
You're looking way too deep into what he says and finding things that aren't there. Regardless, a defense first style does age better than a pressure style. This is only in line with what Kellerman and many other people have said for forever. There's no hypocrisy here.
We all know the rules for Floyd are different. He's expected to fight much bigger men whilst ageing because people can't stand him being undefeated. I've seen people say if you watch his fights in black and white in slow motion backwards that he loses clear as day each time out. The standard he's held to by his crazy detractors might never be seen again. Golovkin will deteriorate from here on out though, it's only natural. I thought he was showing a few signs of it against Brook but was told by his more rabid fans that it was all part of the 'big drama show' he has planned when I thought it may have been a similar kind of warning to what Wlad had when he fought Jennings.