Kelly and Paul fight question

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Zavy, Apr 20, 2009.


  1. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    4,171
    1
    May 14, 2008
    I have read an article, and I also heard during the Williams Wright fight mentioned by Merchant that Williams turned down a fight with The Ghost. Now, I don't really remember this happening. I do remember Kelly saying that he didn't want to fight Paul because everyone would just say he beat up a blown up middle weight. Can anyone clarify this for me?
     
  2. albatross

    albatross New Member Full Member

    86
    0
    Apr 2, 2009
    I could, But who cares man?
    Lets just hope that they fight, now that PW seems worthy
    and comfortable at middleweight.
     
  3. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    4,171
    1
    May 14, 2008
    I care, that's why I asked, and that's what a fourm is for.
     
  4. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    After Pavlik blew Lockett out, and Joe Calzaghe refused to fight the very man he spent 5-6 months calling out, there was a scramble for a fall 2008 opponent for Kelly. It was already clear that Rubio would be the WBC mandatory, but HBO would not buy the fight. Arum offered to do the Top Rank PPV they ended up doing in February 2009 in fall 2008, but KP ask Arum to find something that would pay more.

    During the time they were looking for a fall opponent, Arum struck a deal with Goosen for a fight with Williams. Pav did not want to fight Williams, but he was willing to do it. He even started training for PW. At this point Arum and Goosen have two different stories, but it was some kind of dispute over money that stopped the fight. That's when Hopkins stepped up, and the rest is history.
     
  5. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    :good- Very nice and diplomatic answer. I am somewhat surpirsed at your objectivity on this one.

    Of course, like we have stated to each other before. We probably have differing opinions on what happened based on which fighter we want to believe. But there is one fact that is undeniable: Paul and Kelly were both personally willing to get in the ring.

    The rest is Promoter vs. Promoter bull**** that has no place in Boxing.
     
  6. itrymariti

    itrymariti CaƱas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    Pavlik should fight him, money aside. It's an easier win than some of the other fights out there and it would get quite a bit of credit.
     
  7. D.Will

    D.Will Active Member Full Member

    969
    0
    Jan 25, 2008
    yeah merchant was wrong.
     
  8. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006

    Diplomatic? I see no reason to get into a pissin' match over which liar lied on this particular occasion.
     
  9. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    :good Yep.

    First it was "Who lied about the Margarito situation?" now it's "WHo's lying about KP vs. PW?"

    I personally think both of them are full of ****.
     
  10. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    The Margo situation is physically documented - Goosen offered $4M for a rematch, and Arum turned it down because he said he refused to deal with Goosen after what happened with Pavlik. There's a good chance that it was a bull**** offer because he knew Arum would turn it down no matter how high the dollar figures were, but it's documented on paper. Kevin Iole actually published a .pdf of the response letter from Arum.
     
  11. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    4,171
    1
    May 14, 2008
    thanks for the clarity...it's all news to me