Good to see ya Pipe. I told this noob in the begining he was gonna get his ass handed to him on this thread, and now you're hear to join the fun:happy
u dont have any thing to back up what your saying u say pavlik has had the better fights but fights dont mean any thing
ok so pavlik may have not beat that many great names but he has beat a few and has destroyed every one that has been put in front of him except bhop an atg. but we all know pav was sick and should never have been in the ring that night. so the the thread starter is a ****** for starting this one because he was trying to spell underated and got it confused with over rated
take notes...(got a pen/paper) edit "sad *******" and put a valid reason why people shouldnt think pav is better b/c of his resume/level of competition he's been in with...that would be a start
i think i've done this atsch about 100 times reading what this moron is trying to put forth as a solid argument. stfu and gtfuuuuuuuuckout.
once again the communication process has broken down and you are the reason...try and keep up "the best" isnt the thread title...."overrated" is!!! that is what people are responding too