Kelly Pavlik vs Bernard Hopkins who wins?

I don't suppose your handle would have anything to do with your inability to think rationally about this...

 

Hopkins has gotten by on greatness....BOTTOM LINE

 

That too

 

well you can blame the refs. if they dont make him stop, then he wont. if you saw the fight, the ref warned him repeatedly and didnt once take a point.

 

you gotta be bullshittin right?

 

again,

Ok let me amend. There will not be a time - in THIS particular time-space continuum - at which Pavlik can beat Hopkins. Maybe with a time machine you could take a more seasoned, grizzled, and learned best-case-scenario future Pavlik and put him in the ring with a Hops of the same age and maybe have it be competitive. But Pavlik has a ways to go before he's that good, and by the time that happens Bernard's body will have already retired him for good. :good

 

Kelly is just too green. He has the power and youth to give problems but IMO he still isn't as seasoned nor technically sound as JT.

 

this is the same HOP that got beat by TAYLOR ! PAV wipes him out right now !:good

 

those old guys outworked him but he won anyway. output isn't the point at all.

 

Almost 72% for B Hop. That sounds about right. 70% of the experts here thought Miranda was gonna kill Pavlik with one huge blow from that powerful right hand of his...

:hey

 

I will say that young fighters like Taylor and Dawson are ALL WRONG FOR HOPKINS.

I'd rather him fight Calzag than those two. He would still lose to Calzag at this juncture.

 

. . . and they were wrong. :yep This time it's gonna be right.