Kelly Pavlik vs Carl Froch at 168 who takes it?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MichiganWarrior, Dec 12, 2012.


  1. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009

    Cant even be bothered.
     
  2. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,737
    3,840
    Oct 30, 2011
    Owned, *****. >:D
     
  3. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    ^^^^

    Mack, yes even him.
    Bute
    Johnson
    Abraham
    Pascal


    Are are all better than anyone Pavlik has beaten since Taylor five years ago, who Froch has also beat, albeit a worse version of him. Pavlik has also looked **** in his fights against journeymen during this period.

    There's a shitload of evidence to suggest Froch is better than Pavlik, you'd have to be a pretty stupid person not to acknowledge it.
     
  4. D_Andrade

    D_Andrade Guest

    Right on the money bro!

    This content is protected
     
  5. PowerBack

    PowerBack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,921
    2
    Nov 17, 2012
    Froch walks him down and batters him all over the ring..
     
  6. dendy

    dendy no easy way out Full Member

    2,515
    0
    Apr 10, 2010
    :patsch:rofl:rofl

    ****in priceless
     
  7. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,737
    3,840
    Oct 30, 2011
    So slow caveman Carl the 5mph punch Froch is better than former p4p top 5 undisputed middleweight champion Kelly the drunk Ghost Pavlik? Okay, buddy.
     
  8. dendy

    dendy no easy way out Full Member

    2,515
    0
    Apr 10, 2010
    pair of fudge packers.. Don't get me wrong i respect pavlik but he has never done anything at 168 to suggest he could do to froch what you two say he could. His best days were at 160 and lets be fair he has done nothing since apart from destroy his body. Obviously he has a chance but my reckoning is that ward will batter him so bad that he will be completely done and a fight with froch is just a pipe dream.

    Froch is a proven force at 168 and has showed he is tough enough to live with the best. My reckoning is that pavlik as tough as he is will not be strong enough to go to war with froch and isn't a good enough boxer to win on points.
     
  9. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    Froch is currently better than Pavlik.

    What the **** has what he done 5 years ago got to do with anything?

    You questioned what Froch had done in the last few years to suggest he'd beat Pavlik and I answered, highlighting the lack of anything notable from Pavlik.
     
  10. dendy

    dendy no easy way out Full Member

    2,515
    0
    Apr 10, 2010
    a long time ago it was too and we are talking 168, a weight that pavlik has thus far proved to be less effective at..
     
  11. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Pavlik is finished. Even a stiff, immobile guy like Froch would bust him up.
     
  12. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,737
    3,840
    Oct 30, 2011
    Pavlik, one of the p4p hardest hitters in the sport isn't strong enough for the slowest throwing puncher at Super Middleweight since midget Abraham?
     
  13. D_Andrade

    D_Andrade Guest

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  14. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    But but but he was the middleweight champion 4 years ago.............:patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  15. dendy

    dendy no easy way out Full Member

    2,515
    0
    Apr 10, 2010
    when are you going to get it into your remedial brain that p4p pav
    This content is protected
    one of the hardest hitters whilst he was at 160 some 5 years ago.

    Above 160 pavs power is understandably not what it was and froch happens to have a very good chin with very good power too. Nor is froch as slow as you claim.