Kelly Pavlik vs Carlos Monzon 160lbs

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bobo, Jun 12, 2012.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,158
    Feb 11, 2005
    And powering down his Malbec with 20 or so heaters, a couple bikini clad bimbo's and probably some booger sugar.

    And he's just another echelon than Pav, styles be damned.
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    He would beat Pavlik, again, as i said, after losing the obligatory first few rounds...by a stoppage, and probably flouting every safe rule of training and commiting most of the excesses you listed. You can do that when you have a great boxing mind, regardless of the aesthetic points that are held against him buy the "experts"..all that **** didn't seem to matter much.
     
  3. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,348
    11,383
    Jan 6, 2007
    Upon careful reading of your posts, you're less confused than I initially stated.

    You did not express the point very well as you mixed your tenses, causing some of your sentences to appear off.

    It appeared that you were saying that there was a difference in fighting weights of 147 up to 175 (27 lbs !) for MWs between Monzon's day and current Hopkins.

    Or it could be that I just didn't interpret what you were saying correctly and took you to be counting the same-day previous-day difference twice.


    At any rate, yes there is a difference of about 10-16 lbs. Specifically, the difference between the weight a boxer puts back on in 10 hours versus what he can put back in 34 hours.


    I was aware of the difference in fighting weights between same-day and previous-day weigh-ins. (See links below). I just felt you were double-counting them.


    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=3326604&highlight=weigh-in#post3326604


    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4630024&highlight=weigh-in#post4630024


    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=3479638&highlight=weigh-in#post3479638


    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=6281298&highlight=weigh-in#post6281298





    And that's why I posted earlier in this thread that

     
  4. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Pavliks "6'2.5"" = Monzon's "5'11"" , but Monzon was used 2b d bigger man in his fights which isn't d case here . I saw Pavlik next 2d "6'1"" Paul Williams and Williams was visibly taller . Pavlik would have d weight advantage , and Monzon was also used 2b d heavier man inside d ring in his fights .
    Monzon was durable , but so was Pavlik and Pavlik was more durable than any man Monzon had ever fought .
    Here Monzon gets his advantages sometimes negated and sometimes reversed against him .
    This is Y i don't think much of him on a p4p sense , because he always was @ a physical advantage over his opponents . Never fought some1 nearly equal . What happens when he's actually and suddenly @ a disadvantage ? it never happened 2 him and no1 here has n example 2 how he dealt with such a situation .
     
  5. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Monzon was taller than 5'11.
     
  6. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    If Monzon was taller than 5'11" then so was Pavlik . Wasn't he also taller than d "6'1"" Hopkins ?
    Monzon was not taller than 5'11" and if he was listed as more than it (i once saw a 6'2" stat 4 him) , then Pavlik has d paper credentials as well .
     
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,332
    9,941
    Jun 23, 2008
    Monzon was probably around 6'0. And if given a 24-hr weigh in, he'd probably come to the ring over 170.

    Monzon DOES have a tendency to be overrated. However, he'd have battered Pavlik. Pav is taller, and heavier handed, but thats about it. Monzon has a huge edge in skill, toughness, stamina, accuracy, ring IQ.

    Monzon wide UD, or late TKO.
     
  8. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,225
    1,636
    Sep 13, 2006
    Monzon would win because both were big strong guys, but Monzon had more of an ability to fight on the outside and could box when he wanted to, and I think Monzon had better defense and was quicker and rangier when he wanted to be as well. Pavlik is a one dimensional plodder who hits hard and wears you down, but that would not work against as strong beast like Monzon who had a chin, was tough, could time guys or club them, could clinch, lean back or move away. His awkward but powerful style would win it for him. Fun fight though.

    I'd really like to see Pavlik and Froch, for that might be somewhat comparable.
     
  9. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
  10. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,101
    15,581
    Dec 20, 2006
    If he had been allowed to weigh in the day before he would likely come in around 6'2 as well....Then what would poor kelly do
     
  11. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,101
    15,581
    Dec 20, 2006
    Now that is surprising...I would not have guessed that you might frequent the general forum.