Kelly Pavlik vs. Floyd Mayweather

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Superheavyweight, Jan 27, 2009.


  1. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    The poll shows exactly what I said it shows. Can read son?

    If little Floyd thought he could cherry pick another title he'd be on that like stink on ****. However, he wouldn't even fight the best welters. What on God's earth makes you think he would ever grow the balls to fight a 6' 2" beast of a middleweight?
     
  2. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    If PBF doesn't get caught(which looked very easy) then he wins by 12
     
  3. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    I wonder who'd be the betting favorite???
     
  4. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Easy to make wild claims which you know you will NEVER be proved wrong about because you KNOW Floyd would NEVER step into the ring with Pavlik. If you don't, you should.
     
  5. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest


    answer = hopkins
     
  6. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    My sig is customer made for this thread. :lol:
     
  7. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Let me guess --- you're off your meds again.
     
  8. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    A big joke. :-(
     
  9. Spunik

    Spunik Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,967
    2
    Dec 6, 2008
    the more apt analogy would be Pac versus De La Hoya.

    Don't ever take the MAT......:lol:
     
  10. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
  11. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest


    :dead
     
  12. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    This is not that bad a post. But really Floyd would have to fight strong to win this. He still has to hit Pavlik and hurt him to get a little respect. Yet Floyd is so much better than Pavlik as Hopkins showed us. The size of Pavlik would be too much probably.
     
  13. AussieMauler

    AussieMauler Relative Unknown Full Member

    1,002
    0
    Jul 29, 2004
    This is ridiculous. This is what happens when you open the membership requirements to people who have seen 7 minutes of boxing in their entire life and that includes a minute Floyd highlight reel on youtube.

    FLOYD is brilliant. He is absiolutely amazing.

    He has zero chance of winning against a 6'2 middleweight who has proved to be a very tough SOB.

    Hopkins showed Pavlik it would be dangerous to come forward because Hopkins was a heavier fighter that Pavlik came up for. Yes B Hops was an incredible middleweight. He had been fighting as a Light Heavy for over 2 years prior to the bout. He was a bigger guy with incredible ring knowkedge.

    Pavlik wasnt taught a lesson by a fighter who outclassed but couldnt hurt him. Pavlik was beat up by a superior technician with POWER to hurt him.

    Floyd cannot possibly carry enough muscle on his body to carry on with the finesse that he needs. He just isnt big enough.

    I feel dumber for having dedicated time to this thread simply because there or about 40 complete morons so far and a few who voted just to be funny.
     
  14. Damo1712

    Damo1712 Boss Full Member

    1,280
    0
    Jan 6, 2009
    officially oscar won titles from 130 to 160 even tho sturm got ****ed over:bbb
     
  15. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Mayweather winning is not out of the question.

    Pavlik landed only one clean shot against Hopkins, and Mayweather's defense is not far behind Hopkin's if not better.

    If Spinks can be on the verge of stealing the middleweight title from Jermain Taylor, then Mayweather can certainly succeed against Pavlik.