Kelly Pavliks overrated

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by thespecialone, Jun 25, 2008.


  1. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    As I stated before, Pavs. doing everything he needs to do to be considered a very good fighter @ this time. Great? Time will tell and that's what makes it fun.

    My opinion about Pavlik is he can become as great, maybe greater than Monzon was, and I think Monzon was a great one. Pavs. slightly faster, probably throws a few more punches, fights the full 12 rounds like Monzon fought (15 though), and hits as hard. Monzon had a bit more punches in his bag offensively, had a better (lean back) defense, and I'd never seen him hurt (or hit by a barrage of punches) the way Pav. was against Taylor. If Pav. contiues to improve, especially his defense, he could very well become an ATG.
     
  2. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    :yep Tighten up the defense a bit, and work the bugs out of his footwork.
     
  3. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    Of course. Some have more substance, and while I agree that the forums are filled with low quality posters who claim to know more than they do, and go by some concensus they read somewhere from another inexperienced boxing fan(s).

    However, I do think it is better to either tell them why they are wrong or leave them be. Not that I don't sometimes resort to namecalling - but its not something I am too proud of:lol: .
     
  4. Shifty107

    Shifty107 The MARVELOUS ONE! Full Member

    1,124
    0
    Apr 21, 2008
    I reckon wot makes KP so loveable is that he comes to fight and is pretty humble about it. Also my favourite part of Kelly, apart from that shiny head is his work ethic. He trains extremely hard with unconventional methods. This is the most important part of any fighter. Training, training and a bit more training. Il take a devoted hard working fighter with heart (which kelly has in spades) over an extremely gifted fighter any day. In saying that, kelly is still young and should be able to iron out a few of his flaws before the big day arrives.

    Now alot of the "nuthuggers" are really just neo-nazzis that have read mein kampf too many ****in times and think that Kelly will be the saviour of the aryan brotherhood.
     
  5. billyconn

    billyconn Active Member Full Member

    1,296
    0
    Oct 6, 2007
    Truth hurts....:yep
     
  6. JdMcNudgent

    JdMcNudgent Member Full Member

    380
    0
    Jan 7, 2008

    Not fast??? Are you kidding for a middleweight he is very fast not RJJ fast but fast... He went jab for jab with JT and has very decpetive speed an power. Pavlik shouldnt have a problem with any fighter 160 to 175.
     
  7. El Matador

    El Matador Your Boxing Authority Full Member

    1,538
    4
    Apr 17, 2006
    Kelly Pavlik is underated.

    There, I said it.

    At least, he's being underated by the creator of this thread, that's for sure.

    He's the world champion! Undefeated! Knockout artist with technique and a solid defense! He has heart and makes entertaining matches! He's good!
     
  8. thespecialone

    thespecialone Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    0
    Mar 16, 2008
    Rather than just read the first post why not read the thread and the me justifying my reasons for thinking this. Your post is the sort of thing that makes things suck!
     
  9. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Severely overrated.
     
  10. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    Not severely overated


    Not say so much as Lacy was :lol: but he is indeed over rated by a lot of people. He is a good fighter with good power, but is very basic one two style
     
  11. TheH1tMan

    TheH1tMan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    Hearns had a one two style based on a good jab as well. I think it is too early to say whether he is over or underrated. We know he is good, but is he really great? I don't think anyone can know yet.
     
  12. thespecialone

    thespecialone Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    0
    Mar 16, 2008
    So youre comparing him to Tommy Hearns now?
     
  13. Bslice

    Bslice Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,044
    5
    Sep 11, 2007
    You are severly overated
     
  14. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    lol
     
  15. jsimps

    jsimps Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,172
    1
    Aug 6, 2007
    I think Jim Lampley said it best. "Any tall fighter who throws more than 40+ jabs a round with better than average or great pop is a serious threat to anybody."