Ken Buchanan V Julio Cesar Chavez at Lightweight

oh he did, he just did not get the decision

 

i can see this being a good fight but chavez takes a decision here

 

He didn't , but he still got d decision

 

Those fellows were all bigger than Duran,which is something you already know because I made you aware of it with facts,no matter how hard you deny it.Whitaker is not bigger than Duran.Btw,which one of the 4 you mentioned would Pernell have beaten?

 

To compare the 154 pound Duran with the 135 version is plain silly,but we all know your agenda.

 

He looks chubby and thick,certainly not like what he looked like in his prime in 78.

 

:goodGood post!!Why should reality get in the way of Mag's agenda fueled denial of Buchanan being terrific instead of just depending on the facts.The threadstarter's initial question doesn't matter to Mag.

 

Duran-Nelson would have been a war at lighweight?Nelson was a great FEATHERWEIGHT that was stopped by Chava at 126,but he's going to give Duran A WAR at lightweight?Just based on which lightweight performance by the Professor indicates that?And just what performance by Alexis would indicate that he might have beaten Duran?

 

I gotta hear this. I know you're a troll, but I'm interested in seeing how you spin their rematch as a win for Ramirez, when it's widely acknowledged as one of the most one-sided shut-outs we have on film.

 

I'm sure i've seen him say McCallum was robbed against Kalambay as well.


Must have something against crafty backfoot stylists.

 

Whitaker didn't do any damage and still ran away although it was closer than their 1st which was extremely disgusting 2 watch .

 

I see. You wouldn't mind posting up which rounds Ramirez won then?

 

Watched each 1 of them only 1ce , not going 2 repeat it soon , rarely do scorecards which still (even then) mean almost nothing 2 me .
I did scorecards only 2 Ali vs Chuvalo 1&2 & Ali vs Jones . Tried/started doing it 2 Ali vs Norton & Frazier (i think) but who cares

 

Chavez could do a Duran.?