Ken Buchanan VS Shane Mosley at 135 Pounds

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by emallini, May 11, 2010.


  1. BENNY BLANCO

    BENNY BLANCO R.I.P. Brooklyn1550 Full Member

    10,718
    9
    Mar 8, 2008
    Yeah and your the same clown who said Arguello would KO Mosley in 3 rounds.
     
  2. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Oh shut up, ya hard-on.:patsch
     
  3. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Agreed. Let's be honest here folks, Ken ain't no Philip Holiday. He doesn't have much of a chance of lasting the distance, let alone winning.
     
  4. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Buchanan...... Mosley would be forced to be the aggressor and it's not where he's at home. Buchanan would score with the jab often. Mosley would have his moments when getting inside and make it competitive.
     
  5. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    I say Mosley either by UD or late TKO. Ken's skills will do him justice through much of the bout, but Shane's body punching will take it's toll.
     
  6. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    No doubt. Duran had nothing on Shane when it comes to body-punching....
     
  7. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    mosely has the speed here and for me takes a decision win, but then i think buchanan is very much overrated
     
  8. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    You give me too much credit in the diversity category, guys. I was actually insinuating that Buchanan would be favoured because he was a Duran opponent, and the low blow KO is considered one of his best wins
     
  9. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Or maybe he'll be favoured because of the analysis that's already been posted in this thread, which you've straightforwardly bypassed, instead complaining about old-timer bias?
     
  10. werety

    werety Active Member Full Member

    815
    11
    Apr 30, 2007
    He just made it clear in the passage you quoted that its not old-timer bias. Just his usual Duran bias.
     
  11. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    I'm torn on this match up, Mosley has been outskilled, but by bigger faster men than Ken. Against Ken he has big speed/strength advantages and is a more dangerous fighter than we saw against Mayweather, with his combinations and more active feet.

    Ken has the jab, movement and defensive advantages. Kens jab and boxign ability could be key but I think Mosley does find him. Against Duran though Ken was bullyed and Mosley has the potential to bully him to with his power, speed, combinations and body attack

    I could see either man dominating or it being a close close fight, its a really hard to call fight
     
  12. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
  13. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Especially Mosley lacks experience against good opposition there.
     
  14. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    I'd actually say he was at his best at 135, with his physical and technical tools at their peak by the end of his reign - not that that would necessarily be enough here.
     
  15. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I think he was at his best in his early welter days. While he had the physical advantages in the lw division, he lacked the experience and a bit refinement and was a bit drained. He was more natural at ww, added some experience and refined his skills somewhat.