ken buchanan vs shane mosley

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mr Butt, Apr 5, 2011.


  1. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    ken buchanan vs shane mosley

    at lightweight over 12 rounds
     
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,102
    10,517
    Jul 28, 2009
    I have a feeling that Ken's notorious glass balls would fail him once again and that'd be it. It's a shame, Ken was quite talented. Just too bad about those glass balls, really.
     
  3. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    Buchanan edges Mosely. Buchanan W15 Mosely.
     
  4. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    Buchanan UD15 over Mosley.

    Buchanan needs every ounce of his grit to see the final bell. The last five rounds, though, are easier than 7-10 as Mosley fades.
     
  5. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,026
    18,290
    Jul 29, 2004
    The scots are known for their glass balls.

    It dates back to the invention of the kilt and exposure of the sack to the cold Scottish winters...Dozens of generations of scrotal deterioration led to a common genetic trait in the Scottish people.






     
  6. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    Mosley beats him to the punch every time and finishes every exchange. If Buchanan were faster I would give him the nod in this as I feel he was a more technically sound fighter.
     
  7. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    well mosley's feet are rooted in cement compared to the scot's, much bigger gap there than in handspeed, which will be important as far as in who is actually controlling the initiating of exchanges or jabs in the first place.

    I actually think Buchanan was one of the quicker lightweights overall.Certainly around the time of his initial world title fights.He seemed to lose a clear level or two in speed by 73 though.Mosley has maintained his quite well, even if the combinations dried up post-forrest.
     
  8. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    I'd have to pick Mosely. Very fast, physical lightweight...
     
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    I just love Buchanan's timing in here, Mosley tends to curve his shots a wee bit, I could see Buchanan pumping that jab down the middle and being quite a heavy jab, and with his footwork and foot speed, I could see him sticking and moving and beating Mosley on points. With his movement stifling Mosley's explosive combo's and a snappy left jab muffling them flurries.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    At 135 he had fast feet/reactions, no mover but certainly not rooted in cement.

    Buchanan probably has the better jab, straighter punchers and better timing but Mosley's speed and reactions make it a real tear up. Kenny has the better defense technically but at 135 Mosley's reaction based defense is pretty good in turn. Ken may mix it up a bit too much and Mosley fights well under those situations, especially as he'd be allot stronger than Ken in there

    Slight edge to Mosley but with no real certainty