Ken Norton vs Big Cat Williams

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by choklab, Oct 16, 2015.


  1. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    I'm using Nortons history for the uninformed. It was well understood during Nortons career that he had massive issues when in the ring with top bangers. Of course his first round ko loss to ****ey was Norton way past his prime but those in the know understood the same outcome would have occurred 5 years earlier with Norton at his best. Williams was by all accounts one of boxings great punchers and this is cemented by the comments of Liston and Foreman. Norton had no lateral movement or at least could not move well side to side. His cross arm defense made him open to the left hook which was Williams best weapon whereas Williams generally fought straight up with hands high naturally better able to block Nortons left and right hooks. Against a puncher like Williams Norton would soon find himself against the ropes and hurt. The ko would come soon after. Bottom line is knowing Nortons history against huge punchers and understanding the technical reasons why Ken had issues with huge punchers the odds greatly favor any top notch puncher in the ring with Norton.
     
  2. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,242
    Sep 27, 2011
    By all accounts yet not by record. Did Williams ever KO someone as good as Norton? With the likes of Foreman, Tyson, Louis, Marciano etc you can actually point to their KOs against elite level fighters as a demonstration of their power. Ingemar Johansson KO'd an iron chinned #1 contender and followed up by KO'ing the reigning heavyweight champion. Williams never came close to matching that.

    The best fighter Williams ever KO'd was Ernie Terrell, a decent win in hindsight but at the time Terrell was just a young prospect who was yet to beat a single ranked contender. Every other time Williams fought someone who was either a champion, like Liston, or had a long spell in the top ten, like Machen, his power came up short. He couldn't KO an older and more experienced Terrell. Take away Terrell and his best KOs were against the likes of Roger Rischer and Alex Miteff.
     
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,669
    7,628
    Dec 31, 2009
    Throughout the process of this thread it has become firmly established that without a legitimate knockout over a leading fighter Williams cannot be afforded much certainty as a knockout specialist within the higher ranks.

    Although Williams was a legitimate contender in his own right to be classed as a puncher within that echelon he needs that legitimate knockout over leading fighter. Just one at least. This in no way diminishes Williams capacity to hit hard and knockout lesser fighters. Just not the best ones.

    Lamar Clark was not in Williams league but he hit hard too. Just because Clark did not knockout great fighters does not mean he did not hit as hard as a great fighter. It's not like Lesser fighters necessarily have lesser punch resistance they just stay in the way too long against better fighters. Their anticipation, instinct and responses are not tuned to world class levels. This is why better fighters are harder to knock out. Williams could not get the same connection against them.

    Against better fighters we must rank Williams how he did against better fighters in real life. A puncher who did not make it tell at elite level. Williams fought plenty of top level to fringe class guys that less celebrated contenders could stop and Williams did not stop them.
     
  4. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    The facts are that Norton froze in the ring with heavy punchers. No lateral movement made him a sitting duck. When everyone aside from 2-3 posters on eastside boxing claim Williams was an all time puncher....akin to Liston in power....the majority wins. Norton at his best gets koed quickly by Williams just like he was koed by Foreman and Shavers. 2-3 rounds max. Norton was the better technical fighter but his style, inability to move laterally and mental state in the ring with a big puncher made him a sitting duck. All this is common thought by the experts of the time.
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,669
    7,628
    Dec 31, 2009
    But watch prime Williams against Daniels, simular stance to Norton. Low left hand, side on crab gait. Daniels could not miss Williams with an inferior overhand right that Norton specialised in. This is quite alarming. Together with the highlight reel of Williams crashing to the canvas in a giant heap over and over from even Ali's punches this can't bode well.

    Put Norton in there the night that Williams fought Daniels and it could be a rerun of Norton-Bobick.
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,669
    7,628
    Dec 31, 2009
    So presumably was Lamar Clark.
     
  7. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,234
    8,444
    Oct 8, 2013
    This is well reasoned and basically adheres to the old adage styles make fights and Williams style (hooks with power) is a problem for Norton. I agree. Although I feel Williams is massively overrated I would not pick Ken in this fight.
     
  8. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    Daniels missed as many as he landed vs Williams. Norton was no great puncher by the way. He would often slap with his punches via open or partially open gloves. Again this is something many understood who were close to the game in the 70s. Norton had huge issues with punchers...technically and mentally. He was koed by the three biggest punchers he faced in brutal fashion. He is not avoiding getting koed by the fourth biggest puncher he would face in Williams.
     
  9. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,242
    Sep 27, 2011
    Which heavyweights did Williams KO who were as good as Norton?
     
  10. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    You can ask that question of many fighters. Norton could not handle huge punchers and Williams as per Liston and Foreman as well as many experts was one huge puncher. Norton would more than likely be koed by not only Williams but most all huge punchers in boxing history.
     
  11. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,242
    Sep 27, 2011
    Liston and Foreman both demonstrated their KO power against elite level opposition. Williams never showed he was in that class. His reputation as a monster puncher is based solely on his reputation as a monster puncher, rather than, say, an impressive list of KO victims. He never knocked out a top heavyweight, which is why I have my doubts that he could KO Norton.
     
  12. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,247
    Feb 6, 2009
    The crab gait is what I was getting at in an earlier post.when you are boxing against that style you have to go over your front foot to connect and that's when the problem starts.
    I like the big cat and think the man's physique must have looked scary in 1960 but I can't see him beating Norton
     
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,669
    7,628
    Dec 31, 2009
    So did Williams when he stepped up in class. When the landing ratio goes down each landed punch has to count. Daniels landed plenty of sweeping overhand rights over Williams guard. Lots of them.Norton would too.

    That's not what Larry Holmes said. After the Tyson fight Holmes rated Tyson a sharper puncher but guys like Kenny Norton and Shavers hit harder. But you don't need a fighters endorsement it's plain to see that Norton hit hard. Much harder than say Ali who heavily decked Williams hard a few times and Billy Daniels who made Williams do a funny walk.

    yes proven elite punchers at either side of his prime. Williams had the same problem with elite fighters either side of his prime only there were extra knockdown he suffered against Mel Turnbow, Kirk wheel Barrow and Sylvester Jones. Lots of mediocre guys hurt him. Curley Lee. John Holman, Jack OHaloran The guy always went for it, perhaps a price he paid for his exciting style.
    Ali had him down four times. Liston had him down four times. Satterfeild had him down twice with a twenty pound weight disadvantage.

    Williams was likewise brutalized many a time. He was knocked out 8 times. It works both ways. Lamar Clark hit hard too but Nobody would expect Clark to achieve anything at a level he never won at.
     
  14. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    Again.....no one with any credibility living through that time would argue the point. Norton could not handle real power punchers. He seemed to freeze when hit hard and not recover. Williams was a terrific power puncher. He kos Norton as did all the other power punchers Norton faced. Norton was a strong guy but no great puncher. Slapped a lot with his punches and typically threw both his left hook and right as swings rather than with proper technique. Norton was not a hard fighter to beat if you could punch.
     
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,669
    7,628
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yes like all styles there are pros and cons. With that stance like you say brining a right hand over has to travel further, you almost have to turn round, but Norton would walk a guy onto a change of direction and meet fast speedsters like Ali and Holmes with plenty of right hands. He worked round that. It still means it is difficult to throw combinations from that footing but being so side on can confuse range for the other man. It puts inches on a jab and the left hook comes off the floor from out of sight.surprises people. Bob Foster used it. Moore, Norton too. It worked.