1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ken Norton vs Holyfield, Both physical perfection,and simular styles..

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TheSouthpaw, Aug 17, 2012.



  1. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,900
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 21, 2012
    They've just always reminded me of one another..:deal
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    81,476
    6
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Sep 7, 2008
    Watch more boxing.
     
  3. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,900
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 21, 2012
    Who you got winning?:good
     
  4. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,900
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 21, 2012
    @ FleaMan..I watch at least 6 to 8 hours of fight footage every week.
     
  5. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    5,330
    1
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Nov 5, 2009
    They both are well-sculpted but thats where the similarities end. Holy is the better all-round fighter
     
  6. ETM

    ETM Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,504
    181
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 19, 2012
    This would be a helluva fight. I might go with Norton in this one.

    Evander could be blunted by a good jab and Kenny had one. Kenny Norton was also better defensively. Both were good punchers not great. I see this one going the distance.

    Both guys had underated lefthooks.
     
  7. plumber

    plumber New Member Full Member

    32
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 5, 2010
    Well, Holyfield did much better against punchers than Norton.

    I can see Norton getting blasted out of the ring against fighters like Bowe, Tyson, Lewis.

    But Norton almost beat prime Holmes while prime Holyfield almost lost to a 43 yr old Holmes. Some say Evander really lost that fight.
    I also think that Holyfield wouldn't do as well against Ali as Norton did.

    Based on that I would have to go with Norton. But Ali and Holmes weren't as good on the inside as Holyfield was. And I just can't get that brilliant performance against Tyson out of my head.

    And what about Michael Moorer? Reminds me somewhat of Norton, but he's not as big and strong as Norton. Seriously, you can debate this all day long, but the fact is that those two are even fighters and when they meet, it can go either way.
     
  8. plumber

    plumber New Member Full Member

    32
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 5, 2010
    I don't think Norton's jab is as good as Bowe's or Lewis'. I also think that Holyfield could get inside Wladimir Klitschko, who posseses a more dangerous jab than Norton.
     
  9. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,900
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 21, 2012
    So do you guys believe Holyfield would have just outpowered him ass well..
     
  10. plumber

    plumber New Member Full Member

    32
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 5, 2010
    No, it goes to the judges.

    I don't think the fight would be that great, by the way. I'd be more interested in how Joe Louis does against modern boxers. Him against Holyfield.

    Or Ali vs. Vitali ... Holmes vs. Lewis.
     
  11. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,900
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 21, 2012
    @plumber..I think it would be a much better fight than you think...I think somebody is goin down...
     
  12. Stevie G

    Stevie G Boxing Junkie Full Member

    20,771
    92
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 17, 2009
    Holyfield could have beaten quite a few fighters who could've beaten Norton. However,Ken had the style that would have given Evander a lot of trouble. I actually feel that this fight has the potential to be a hypothetical classic.


    Norton by close decision in an action packed fight.
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Boxing Junkie Full Member

    17,754
    182
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 4, 2008
    The big difference between them is that Norton didn't at all have that warrior's mentaility. When the stakes got really high, with punchers of brutal power, Norton couldn't conduct himself as a true pro should. Holyfield on the other hand held perhaps too few fears of that kind.

    But going forward against lighter punching boxers Norton was almost complete. Strong, great stamina, good punch, very good defence, agressive but cunning, excellent punch selection and body attack, etc, etc.

    Have no real problem seeing him beating Holyfield, but who can say.
     
  14. red cobra

    red cobra Boxing Junkie Full Member

    33,290
    337
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 28, 2004
    Holyfield was far more rugged and capable against thunderous punchers...but he too would have been eaten alive by the young George Foreman...that's another similarity I see between the two.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    81,476
    6
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Sep 7, 2008
    Holyfield's uppercuts would work well for him here.