Ken Norton vs. Joe Walcott

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Feb 29, 2008.


  1. RoccoMarciano

    RoccoMarciano Blockbuster Full Member

    2,892
    16
    Jan 15, 2007
    I think your view on this is pretty accurate. Ali was the greater fighter as well, and one could choose to compare Ali with JJ Walcott.
     
  2. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004
    I think Nortons size would eventually wear JJW down. Jersey Joe wasn't a knockout artist, so Kenny wouldn't have to be extra cautious.
     
  3. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Good post.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  4. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,675
    Aug 18, 2012
    I believe Norton would befuddle Walcott as he did Ali. Walcott relied upon establishing his jab but here Norton would dominate. Both were a bit chinny but Norton has the edge in power here. Walcott’s advantage is his boxing ability but being outjabbed reduces this advantage. Fight is competitive early with Norton’s jab becoming more of a problem for Walcott as the rounds advance. At some point mid fight Norton lands a crushing overhand right that eventually leads to a stoppage. Norton by tko in 10 rounds.
     
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Is this really the conventional wisdom on Walcott? In the fights I've seen, Walcott seemed a lot more interested in trying to counter jabs than in trying to establish any kind of dominance with his own jab.
     
    BitPlayerVesti and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  6. ray fritz

    ray fritz Active Member Full Member

    767
    271
    Nov 4, 2018
    Kenny gets the nod