Ken Norton would easily defeat the bum Klitschkos

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by I Know Everythi, May 29, 2014.


  1. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    Ken Norton had a field day against outside boxers all the time. He lost to big punchers, but the Klitschkos are not one punch KO artists.

    They have high KO ratios because they jab jab jab right hand over the course of several rounds against bums with 6 round conditioning. They could not KO Haye (stopped at Cruiser), Chisora (D-class heavyweight stopped by cruiser Haye), or 38 year old past prime worst shape of his life Lennox Lewis (not a steel chin by heavyweight standards even in his prime). Instead, Vitali got TKOd against this worst condition Lennox in a fight that was clearly turning in Lennox's favor.

    Larry Holmes is a much better outside boxer than either Klitschko, has a much better stronger and faster jab, and is faster in general than either Klitschko. He is also much better technically as an all around outside (or inside) boxer. Not only is he better technically, but he also (in his prime) has the ability to adjust when technical fighting doesnt work. Vitali failed to do so against 38 year old shot past prime worst condition Lennox and Wladimir failed all three times against Brewster Sanders Purrity. He also went life and death to survive C-class Sam Peter's "murderous" assault.

    Despite Holmes being vastly superior in every aspect of boxing to the Klitschkos, it took him a very tough effort to beat a Ken Norton slightly past his prime. Holmes is hardly a feather fist, and he still couldn't stop Ken Norton. No way would the Klitschkos be able to do that if they couldn't stop Haye Chisora or 38 year old Lennox (instead getting stopped in return). Ken Norton got knocked out by Cooney, Foreman, and Shavers, Shavers and Foreman possibly being the hardest and second hardest hitting heavyweights of all time. Cooney perhaps top 15. Garcia loss was when Ken only had 15 fights, so not much to draw from that.

    Ken Norton against the much more elusive Muhammad Ali, even post suspension, was able to cut off the ring and easily outbox Ali in 2 of 3 fights. Even when Ali defeated a prime Ken Norton in the rematch, it took him an extremely hard effort to do so. Ali is much more elusive than the Klitschkos, is faster, has a better jab, and is a much better outside boxer than either of them. He is also much better than either Klitschko at making adjustments. When the Klitschkos have to adjust (Lennox, Brewster, Sanders, Purity) they are unable to do so.

    Ken Norton would cut off the ring against both Ukrainian bums, outbox them from the outside, his awkward jab would easily give the Klitschkos fits if Lennox's slow plodding past prime 38 year old self could crush Vitali on the inside and batter his face with a standard jab.

    Angelo Dundee on Ali vs Norton - Muhammad just could not time Ken's jab. and can anyone expect the Klitschkos to do so? Nope

    Ken Norton would be on the outside telling Wladimir

    "Those fake paper WBO partial defenses of the title don't make you close to the great Joe Louis or Larry Holmes. When I use the bathroom I will clean myself using your fake 16 toilet paper defenses accumulated against bums and nobodies like Peter and Byrd."

    Then with Vitali he will say

    "How can you call yourself heavyweight champion when you couldn't even beat the last legit heavyweight champion? You beat all these bums and somehow you are on Lennox Lewis' level? Just don't quit on me with your shoulder injury or we'll have another TKO6.

    Try being like Evander Holyfield and at least fight to the end with your injury. You don't even have a heart condition to deal with like he did. And unlike you he was actually fighting a difficult opponent"


    End of discussion. Klitschkos are not top 100 p4p all time and not top 20 heavyweights all time because they never beat one historically elite or great fighter.
     
  2. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    This content is protected


    1. Ali
    2. Louis
    3. Holmes
    4. Marciano - overrated like the Klitschkos, but his weak wins are not as weak as the Klitschkos
    5. Dempsey
    6. Jack Johnson
    7. Harry Wills
    8. Sam Langford
    9. Mike Tyson
    10. Sonny Liston
    11. Ezzard Charles
    12. Jersey Joe Walcott - his robbery against Joe Louis is more than enough to surpass Klitschkos
    13. George Foreman
    14. Evander Holyfield
    15. Riddick Bowe - his only good wins are Holyfield, but that is by far more than enough to surpass Sam Peter as your best win
    16. Gene Tunney
    17. Joe Frazier
    18. Lennox Lewis - he destroyed the better of the Klitschkos despite being in the worst moment of his career at 38 yrs old, so obvious choice
    19. Ken Norton - his wins over Ali and Young surpass anything the Klitschkos did, despite his multiple KO losses
    20. Sam Mcvey - wins over Langford, Jeanette, and Wills surpass anything of the Klitschkos
    21. Archie Moore
    22. Jimmy Young - robbery vs Ali and only guy besides Ali to beat a 70s Foreman. Most of the guys he lost to were top level, unlike the Klitcshko bums' losses
     
  3. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Whatever gets you off but Wlad likely has enough power and technique to put Norton on his heels and knock him out. The left hook off the jab would be bad news for the Crab defense.

    Vitali/Norton would be intresting.
     
  4. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    See prime Holmes vs slightly past prime Ken Norton

    Not possible for Wladimir
     
  5. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    I'm very much aware of such a famous fight but Holmes lacked the two handed power to back Norton off. Holmes had quite a few hard nights because of that.
     
  6. Tancred

    Tancred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,338
    4
    May 2, 2014
    Vitali has the better chance of beating norton
    Although if
    Wlad changes tactics and starts fast and without much caution he could score a very quick win
     
  7. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    I see it as the opposite. Norton wouldn't be able to pressure Wlad because he would have to walk through so much fire power.

    Vitali lacked snap and relies more on volume punching to put guys away. I think he's more comparable to an Ali and Holmes in the power department. Given Norton more of a shot.
     
  8. JacK Rauber

    JacK Rauber Unbourboned by what has been Full Member

    11,841
    14,546
    Oct 20, 2013
    The only ones having a shot at beating Wlad would 1, 2, 3, 13, 15, 18 and maybe 10, 14 and 19. The other ones lack the size necessary to get to his chin. Look how Lewis played with Tua even though Tua was one of the hardest punchers in the game. Yep, size does matter.
     
  9. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    this is in terms of rankings. heavyweights several years ago were obviously smaller. Pound for pound those heavyweights are unquestionably more accomplished and skilled.

    with the same skills and same size, both Ukrainian bums lose to all aforementioned fighters

    also, Tyson, Holyfield, Young, and Joe Frazier would definitely crush either Klitschko.

    prime Tyson was an expert at sliipping jabs (especially slow ones) and killing the body

    Holyfield easily handled the superior jab of Riddick Bowe in the rematch despite Bowe being much bigger. also, Bowe was a better inside AND outside fighter than either Klitschko. no problem for Evander. Also took shots from old Foreman and old Holmes, who despite being old still had great jabs, were much bigger than Evander, and still very skilled. Holyfield also has the intangibles to adjust and dig deep when technique is not working unlike the Klitschkos.

    Jimmy Young made a living of outboxing guys like Ali and Foreman - Ali is more elusive, better jab than Klitschkos, and better outsie boxer. Foreman hits much harder, is better at cutting off the ring, the same quality of jab as Klitschkos and Young had no problem

    Joe Frazier - dropped steel chin elusive Ali, a much better outside boxer than slow plodding Klitschkos. Ali had problems connecting with his vastly superior jab than the Klitsckos.

    Klitschkos stand no chance against anyone who knows how to fight against a jabber

    Tua is one of the most limited boxers of all time. terrible example. size matters, but not to the degree you think
     
  10. lefthandlead

    lefthandlead Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,984
    878
    Jan 1, 2010
    Norton has glass in his chin
     
  11. SUGAR J

    SUGAR J P4P KING Full Member

    2,052
    1
    May 10, 2011
    Norton would have smashed the Klitchbots.
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    brain size in your case.

    Dempsey and Louis half-killed the giant world champs they fought. Tyson tore through champs five inches taller.

    yeah they sure had trouble reaching their chins.

    Having said that, Norton is obviously not going to just walk through the Klits, it would be fairly even fights on both counts I reckon, with wlad being at a major disadvantage due to his bad chin, facing a prime Hofer is probably going to end with him on the floor if a 38 year old retired neverman can stop him inside 200 seconds. Vitali has a fair chance of toughing it out with Norton if he can learn to fight more defensively.
     
  13. dan4579

    dan4579 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,269
    420
    Apr 11, 2011
    Hmm...I can give you examples of Wladimir smashing top 10 guys about Nortons size. Can you give me examples of Norton beating top 10 fighters that are 6'6, 245lbs? Things change. The 1977 Steelers wouldnt stand a chance of defeating the 2013 Seahawks, and Ken Norton would not belong in the same ring with the current champion.
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,113
    25,276
    Jan 3, 2007
    That's a lot of time wasted trolling that I WON'T be replying to.
     
  15. JacK Rauber

    JacK Rauber Unbourboned by what has been Full Member

    11,841
    14,546
    Oct 20, 2013
    You can't project how big the old heavyweights would be. As they were, they could not beat Wlad.

    Jimmy Young never crushed anyone, he outpointed them. I loved watching Young fight but I don't see how he scored on Wlad.

    That's the 64K questions, could any of these guys get inside against Wlad. Hard to say. He has become quite accomplished at robotically throwing a piston like jab, followed by a thundering right. Hey, I'm not a Klitschko fan but I think he is tough to get to if you are under 6'4". Clip his chin and you take him out.

    I was outraged at what they allowed him to do against Povetkin. The ref should never be allowed to ref another bout.