Ken Norton would easily defeat the bum Klitschkos

:deal

 

This thread doesn,t make sense ....could be the worst ever ( not counting the lounge threads ofcourse )

 

OMG for real , seriously. Norton could NOT hold either kilist joke.
he would get destroyed as soon as the first clean jab landed. because followed would be that crazy quick lefthook or that GOOD night straight right.

just because Norton was better than ali h2h does NOT mean he was elite for xrist sakes

 

i know that the Klitschko's get ranked too high by their fans in a crazy manner. but their detractors are also carzy... as you can see here.

Wlad dominates Norton from range and picks apart the rubbish defence that Ken had. a stoppage wouldn't come in the earlier rounds though due to Wlad being a cautious fighter. but he gets the win no doubt.

Vitali (in his prime of course) would wreak Norton like it's a children's party, and he's the evil clown coming to bring terror to the child like Norton. Ken gets knocked out by the mid stage after getting a one sided beating put on him in a clear mismatch.

so no, Norton doesn't beat them at all.

as for the other list of fighters you have beating them, i won't bother wasting any more time on a crazy nobody like yourself.

good day to you.

 

yeah, his racism is just too damn obvious.

**** him. he's clearly threatened by White fighters and wishes to show us his insecurity. just mock him like the ****** he is.

 

no there is no definitely for some of them. young wouldn't definitely, he would likely lose.

 

Surely you don't want to call me I know everything.

 

Ken's got as good a chance as the watermelons had against Gallagher

 

I think you're an idiota.Douglas-Tyson. Tyson could knock Douglas down with one punch.
Douglas was lucky. Tyson beat taller guys than Douglas.
For example 6'5" Tucker(reigning IBF w. champion),6'5 biggs(olympic ch) who beat
Lewis etc.
Tyson is the only man who could destroy Holmes.Holmes had great chin,skill
and he was faster than the lame klitschkos.
McCall couldn't knock a 45 years old Holmes out.But he destroyed Lennox Lewis
easily. This old,out of shape Lewis beta the prim vitali kllitschko.
Plus a very bad/post-prison,mental-collapsed,promoter-trainer-manager and skill
and stamina problematic Tyson could win the first round against Lewis.
This lewis was in good shape.
But Lewis was total unprepared against V.klitschko.
Jab thing doesn't count in Tyson's case.He could humiliate these boring jab- losers.
Plus the maybe 6' tall,slow,fat,featherfisted byrd beat vitali klitschko.
Tyson was much more effective in his prime than these klitschkos.
Shut up rauber!You're a troll.

 

^This. Norton goes out on his back against either prime Klitschko. No way he can take what they dish out.

 

Come on, this is not that complicated. A previous post made the point that Dempsey and others beat previous "giants." My response was, these "giants" were not anything special, certainly not as talented as WK. In fact, much less talented than WK. You still with me?

Have you seen Willard? Tall, yes, but not built like say, Jeffries. Johnson KO'd Jeffries. Willard KO'd Johnson.

More giants. Baer KO'd Carnera. Baer was 210. Klitschko would easily KO Baer.

Hey, it's all speculation anyway. We'll never know but from what I have seen of WK, he is one of the better "giants." He isn't only big but he is very strong and fundamentally sound. He certainly is not as gifted as Louis or Ali but his size and fundamentals could possibly overcome the lack of comparative athleticism.

 

Norton was a jello-jawed bum who lost to every big puncher he faced. Wlad would back that overrated fraud up with his power left jab and finish him with the first strong overhand right he landed. All those diminutive heavyweights from the 70's wouldn't stand a chance against a modern, giant technical and powerful heavyweight like either Klitschko. Wlad's haters are just butt-hurt Americans that can't handle that their fighters no longer are competitive at the heavyweight division.