Ken Shamrock in his early days

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by Canibus81, Oct 8, 2008.


  1. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    Does anybody think Ken deterioated when left the UFC to go to the WWE. Or does anybody think he was matching up with better fighters when he cameback? I think he deterioated when he cameback. I don't think Tito would of had his way with Shamrock in his earlier days if you swapped Shamrock from his earlier days in with the evolution of the sport.
     
  2. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Its like this prime Tito will always destroy any verson of Ken. Titos got better hands with tells you how bad Kens hands are,way better clinch,stronger,better wrestler,better GNP,BJJ etc. Look at there 3 fights and please show me something that Ken can do 3 fights he lost every secound of every round exept for that 1 KD in the 1st fight which Tito quickly recovered from then continued his brutal assault.
     
  3. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    Ken had much more physical strength, reflexes, conditioning, and punch resistance in his prime, than walking corpse Tito fought. Go watch his fight with big Dan Severn, who's a hell of a lot stronger than Tito.
     
  4. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    There is no comparison to the fighters of 1995 to a guy like Tito Ortiz. Severn was a wrestler and nothing else Tito has many more aspects to his game his training and all around game dwarfs Severns and Shamrocks. Im not expecting Tito to go in and knock Shamrock out or submitt him but it wouldnt be awhole lot different then there first meeting in 2002 just not as totally one sided. Shamrock never had any striking ability what so ever his made Tito look amazing watch there first fight Tito put on a Muay Thai and boxing clinic. Titos just to strong for him hes always bullied Shamrock and would do the same. Go ahead and say Shamrock was a walking corpse but Tito wasnt exactly doing to well himself dont forget Shamrock wasnt the only one fighting with an ACL problem in the 1st bout and Tito neglected his back injury for years including their pointless rematches in 06. The long fights Ken had back then where he just sat in someones guard or got dry humped have nothing on the kinda pace Tito Ortiz could force just ground and pounding not to mention what would do if actually attempted to pass or submitt.
     
  5. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    I don't think tito could take Ken down and Ken was completely shot, doesn't matter about the injuries Tito was fighting, he's body was much more preserved. And your right, Tito was a little more rounded than Severen, but I just don't think he has the physical strength to take Ken down. I also said IF KEN IN HIS EARLIER DAYS FOUGHT IN TITOS ERA. So that means Ken would have better training and more well roundedness as well. But the main question I asked was, does anybody think he was terribly washed up when he cameback, or still the same but fought just fought better comp. so hard to tell. that was the question.
     
  6. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    He was somewhat washed up considering his age and all the steroid abuse in the WWF but he was fighting much more well rounded fighters and didnt evolve his training enough. Todays game actually requires gameplans for your fights Ken has none hes a fairly stupid fighter all his fights go the same he comes out and just stands there throws an occasional punch and gets KOed by the 1st thing that almost touches him.
     
  7. Rattler

    Rattler Middle Aged Man Full Member

    3,925
    18
    Feb 9, 2005
    He wasn't "washed up" when he came back. He was about five grades behind the curve. What worked against one dimensional fighters didn't work anymore and he was too egotistical to accept it, so he did the same old thing and found different results.
     
  8. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Ken never deteriorated. He just never evolved. His whole act was a WWF charade. I mean c`mon his standup was weak his submission game only consisted of an ankle lock and he just couldnt live up to his aura. The facts remain Ken was never that good. A pioneer yes but his brother had way more skills than him.
     
  9. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    True and his brother was never THAT great.
     
  10. Kairos

    Kairos Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Aug 20, 2008
    No he deteriorated cleary from his pancrase days. Anyone who says otherwise is an idiot.
     
  11. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    What happened to Ken was the same thing that happend to Royce..same thing that happened to Severn, to Coleman, to Mo smith, Frye...they got old and they got behind..thats all..its a pretty young sport...it will evolve quicker...5 years from now..even GSP will be behind..youll see guys that will be flying in the octagon...Actually in muy opinion..Anderson Silva is a precursor to what most MMA fighters stand up will look like in a few years..with a ground game like BJ
     
  12. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    ken couldnt beat tito EVER in any way ...tito is far superior in strength and GNP and has much more real experience with real well rounded fighters
     
  13. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pancrase rules and MMA are 2 VERY diffrent sports. Was Ken able to adjust? The answer is an astounding no. Bas Rutten was also the same.
     
  14. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    I mite be wrong but didnt Bas have more loses in Pancrase than in MMA/UFC and injuries stopped him competing?
    To be fair, I think if they were both introduced to mma today Bas would do much better than Ken, he was much more well rounded than Ken would ever be. Would be interesting to see how they match up to modern mma fighters, any thoughts?
     
  15. Koa

    Koa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,380
    3
    Sep 24, 2004
    The thing is, Ken is like an old dog who has been around and has had every opportunity to learn and evolve. He is barely a different fighter stylewise than he was at his peak.

    He never evolved... Okay, maybe he learned how to throw a knee. But other than that the only weapons on the ground he's ever had have been ankle manipulations.

    Ken Shamrock = Heel hook bomber with absolutely no defense.

    Tito in his prime was a takedown artist, with gnp that was reasonably effective from full guard. This is actually quite a special thing that only a handfull of fighters are good hat. Its not the prettiest thing to see, but it basically made Tito Ortiz.

    Tito's takedown ability becomes more and more limited with his aging, and opponents knowing he has a singular gameplan. Since his takedown ability stock has plummeted, due to him not being able to throw hands very well to set up takedowns, Tito as a fighter's stock has gone down..

    Thing about Ken, he has never even been great at takedowns.