kessler cant beat calzaghe

I've been picking Kessler for months mate.

 

I am a doubting Calzaghe, Kessler and Bute fan. I can see Calzaghe beating Kessler, Kessler beating Bute and Bute beating Calzaghe...but I can also see Kessler beating both Calzaghe and Bute. I cannot see Bute beating both Calzaghe and Kessler, however.

 

Your 100% prediction ratio is on the line.

 

'


That circle jerker still did more then your guy..man I loathe you....Eccentric is kind of like Prince used to be or Rick James... and damned for sure...Calzaghe fans are on that platform of thinking...I do not doubt that you have a hand made Calzaghe photo print T-shirt...and maybe stalked him a few times and hung around his gym...:blood

 

Indeed.

But you dont have to be a fan of either Kessler or Calzaghe to see that we have two boxing phenomenen fighting each other.

I am not as hard on Taylor as you. He's fought bad ass guys and come out of it pretty wel. You NEED Talent in order to do so. Another thing is that JT had HBO AND talent. I despise that as well.

 

Incorrect on all counts in this post.

 

Yes my friend, but we deal with jokers who think Wright-Hopkins was more significant than JC-MK.

I find such insulting.

 

I noticed - but seriously thought it was a joke.

I mean - look at your posts, profile and everything. Are you dead serious?

 

I dont care..so what JT is going to probably get knocked out by pavlik..he still was a decent middleweight champ no matter what your ECCENTRIC butt says.

 

Well the boxing world is against you..Winky and Bhop are established future hall of fame guys that will always be regarded Higher the Joey....no matter what your crazy butt thinks.

 

You just don't beat a beast like Kessler at 35, if you do you are quite simply the GOAT by a mile.

 

That is just laughable - Wright Vs Hopkins totally slipped my attention and it was as boring and insignificant as I thought.

It is insulting - and it is also ****ing moronic:deal :fire :fire :fire

 

Youre not, I guess.

Picking Kessler to make Joe look good.

 

Listen dude - Hopkins is an ATG and Winky is a damn good defensive fighter.

But what was the significance of the fight. Did it have a place in history? Where the fighters prime?
No, No, No, No, No. It didnt mean ****, but money.

 

Precisely, I obviously want Calzaghe to beat Kessler, but if Kessler wins, believe me on how I will congratulate him and give him the necessary recognition(I already rate him as one of the best fighters in the world), but he'd have knocked off an aging, but true P4P force.

All of the moronic ends talk about resume, resume, resume - while failing to correctly assess a resume, resume means a whole lot, but also reading what the resume really means.

Kessler's resume is quite good, enough to be ranked P4P, because of how he has dealt with his opposition, which was been very good.

You just have to ask yourself, do you think getting controversial decisions over aging P4P names is superior to absolutely destroying younger, underrated fighters.

I can't see a guy like Taylor or Wright beating Mundine for example, or Andrade for that matter. Kessler's results were 116-112 Mundine and 120-108 Andrade, Taylor would lose to both, as would Wright.