Kessler has proven nothing against Haussler

And still aging, and still slipping..

 

No joking here...Pavlik has lost against BHop, but he also has won against some really good opponents. Don't even think that Kessler would win easy against him. I agree on AA though. AA will be more than difficult to beat. Kessler's jab is very good and he is a really strong guy, but AA wouldn't just stay behind his turtle shell - he would fight back and everybody knows that he has a punch and that he can take a punch.

 

I have to see the fight yet. Like i said i copy/paste from fightews...they were wrong about WBC, maybe they are for that too.:-(

 

No way Pavlik moves up and beats this monster called Kessler.Kessler is just bigger,stronger,technically sound.Pavlik would get schooled again.Abraham might do it

 

Yes I have, but a bum is a bum. German boxing is sad.

 

:huh What has German boxing to do with mandatory shot?

 

Haussler tried but should never have been in the ring with Kessler.

 

Pavlik? LOL. Back down to 160 for him. He can't compete with likes of Kessler at 169, PERIOD! Kesslers not a southpaw, it wasn't a straight left. Technically it was a jab the same one that KO'd Beyer. Oh yeah this was a F"£$ing MANDATORY!!!! Apart from Calzaghe no one can currently beat Kessler at this weight IMO.

 

I think he talks about German fighters who were born in Germany. Since Ottke (yes, slap me, but he wasn't bad) there haven't been any good ones.

 

I agree, Kessler is just like a bigger and better version of Pavlik.
In a fight with Abraham Kessler is still the favorite maybe something like 70%:30% ...but in every fight that Abraham will take in his career there will always be the chance that Abe wins by KO

 

Yep

 

What did Bute prove? He had a ref in the bag? I think so!

 

So american boxing is not?

 

Damn,you'r logic is good:-(

 

Not as bad as German, we have better opposition for Kessler here.